It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FIG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTYL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FIG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TYL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
FIG (@Packaged Software) experienced а -24.84% price change this week, while TYL (@Packaged Software) price change was -22.08% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -7.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +154.65%.
FIG is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2026.
TYL is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2026.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| FIG | TYL | FIG / TYL | |
| Capitalization | 10.6B | 14.3B | 74% |
| EBITDA | -1.03B | 535M | -193% |
| Gain YTD | -42.762 | -26.853 | 159% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 46.18 | - |
| Revenue | 969M | 2.3B | 42% |
| Total Cash | 1.61B | 951M | 169% |
| Total Debt | 61.2M | 643M | 10% |
FIG | TYL | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 73 | 56 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 59 Fair valued | 75 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 87 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | 73 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 66 | 65 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 97 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FIG's Valuation (59) in the null industry is in the same range as TYL (75) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that FIG’s stock grew similarly to TYL’s over the last 12 months.
FIG's Profit vs Risk Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as TYL (100) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that FIG’s stock grew similarly to TYL’s over the last 12 months.
TYL's SMR Rating (73) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as FIG (99) in the null industry. This means that TYL’s stock grew similarly to FIG’s over the last 12 months.
TYL's Price Growth Rating (65) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as FIG (66) in the null industry. This means that TYL’s stock grew similarly to FIG’s over the last 12 months.
TYL's P/E Growth Rating (97) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as FIG (100) in the null industry. This means that TYL’s stock grew similarly to FIG’s over the last 12 months.
| FIG | TYL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 47% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 37% | 1 day ago 57% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 15% | 1 day ago 60% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 18% | 1 day ago 56% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 30% | 1 day ago 56% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 26% | 1 day ago 60% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 32% | 14 days ago 53% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 29% | 1 day ago 59% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 38% | 1 day ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 19% | 1 day ago 62% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ULTY | 35.71 | N/A | N/A |
| YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strat ETF | |||
| SMAX | 27.06 | -0.05 | -0.18% |
| iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Sep ETF | |||
| NXTE | 41.90 | -0.30 | -0.72% |
| AXS Green Alpha ETF | |||
| PEJ | 60.40 | -0.54 | -0.89% |
| Invesco Dynamic Leisure and Entmnt ETF | |||
| HIMZ | 3.37 | -0.26 | -7.16% |
| Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor tells us that FIG and NATL have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FIG and NATL's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FIG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FIG | 100% | -10.88% | ||
| NATL - FIG | 26% Poorly correlated | -2.54% | ||
| CCRD - FIG | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TYL - FIG | 21% Poorly correlated | -8.50% | ||
| ROP - FIG | 3% Poorly correlated | -6.38% | ||
| PEGA - FIG | 3% Poorly correlated | -8.47% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TYL has been loosely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TYL jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TYL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TYL | 100% | -8.50% | ||
| COIN - TYL | 59% Loosely correlated | -4.36% | ||
| CLSK - TYL | 58% Loosely correlated | +2.90% | ||
| RIOT - TYL | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.13% | ||
| PCTY - TYL | 52% Loosely correlated | -6.13% | ||
| ADSK - TYL | 50% Loosely correlated | -5.78% | ||
More | ||||