Advertisement
FIG vs NATL
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIG is a Hold and NATL is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FIG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNATL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- FIG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- NATL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FIG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NATL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FIG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- NATL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
FIG (@Packaged Software) experienced а -0.02% price change this week, while NATL (@Packaged Software) price change was -3.73% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -0.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +36.27%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-0.88% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| FIG | NATL | FIG / NATL | |
| Capitalization | 20.1B | 2.69B | 747% |
| EBITDA | 54.9M | 767M | 7% |
| Gain YTD | 113.075 | 7.341 | 1,540% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 20.81 | - |
| Revenue | 893M | 4.27B | 21% |
| Total Cash | 1.62B | 357M | 455% |
| Total Debt | 64.7M | 3.02B | 2% |
FIG | NATL | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 85 | 14 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 68 Overvalued | 63 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 66 | 54 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | 21 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 42 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 23 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NATL's Valuation (63) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as FIG (68) in the null industry. This means that NATL’s stock grew similarly to FIG’s over the last 12 months.
NATL's Profit vs Risk Rating (54) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as FIG (66) in the null industry. This means that NATL’s stock grew similarly to FIG’s over the last 12 months.
NATL's SMR Rating (21) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for FIG (97) in the null industry. This means that NATL’s stock grew significantly faster than FIG’s over the last 12 months.
FIG's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as NATL (52) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that FIG’s stock grew similarly to NATL’s over the last 12 months.
NATL's P/E Growth Rating (42) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FIG (100) in the null industry. This means that NATL’s stock grew somewhat faster than FIG’s over the last 12 months.
| FIG | NATL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 38% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 10% | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 9% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 24% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 19% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 30% | 4 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 21% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 41% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 9% | 2 days ago 83% |
Advertisement
FIG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FIG and NATL have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FIG and NATL's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FIG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FIG | 100% | -1.08% | ||
| NATL - FIG | 25% Poorly correlated | +1.65% | ||
| CCRD - FIG | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ROP - FIG | 3% Poorly correlated | +2.69% | ||
| PRO - FIG | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PEGA - FIG | -1% Poorly correlated | -1.40% | ||
More | ||||
NATL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NATL has been loosely correlated with EEFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NATL jumps, then EEFT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NATL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NATL | 100% | +1.65% | ||
| EEFT - NATL | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.99% | ||
| CPAY - NATL | 52% Loosely correlated | -1.36% | ||
| NTCT - NATL | 48% Loosely correlated | -0.35% | ||
| FFIV - NATL | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.70% | ||
| WEX - NATL | 46% Loosely correlated | -2.42% | ||
More | ||||