Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIFPX vs RGACX
FIFPX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FIFPX vs RGACX
Fidelity Advisor Founders M
Price$25.31
Change+$0.17 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets213.11M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.62
Change+$0.46 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
FIFPX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIFPX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIFPX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. FIFPX (213M). RGACX pays higher dividends than FIFPX: RGACX (0.07) vs FIFPX (0.00). FIFPX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FIFPX (7 years) vs RGACX (23 years). FIFPX (1.31) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). FIFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). FIFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: FIFPX (0) vs RGACX (250). FIFPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.17 vs. RGACX (21.05). FIFPX return over 5 years is better than : 68.13 vs. RGACX (42.51).
| FIFPX | RGACX | FIFPX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.94 | 139% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.94 | 139% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.782 | 16.155 | 61% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 213M | 332B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.17 | 21.05 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.68 | 51.55 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 68.13 | 42.51 | 160% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 97.10 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement