Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIFNX vs RGACX
FIFNX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FIFNX vs RGACX
Fidelity Advisor Founders
Price$26.50
Change+$0.14 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets213.11M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$84.36
Change+$0.32 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.88B
FIFNX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIFNX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIFNX is a Buy and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. FIFNX (213M). RGACX pays higher dividends than FIFNX: RGACX (0.07) vs FIFNX (0.00). FIFNX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FIFNX (7 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FIFNX (0.77). FIFNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). FIFNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: FIFNX (0) vs RGACX (250). FIFNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.00 vs. RGACX (12.22). FIFNX return over 5 years is better than : 77.74 vs. RGACX (45.63).
| FIFNX | RGACX | FIFNX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.94 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.94 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.345 | 17.183 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 213M | 337B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.00 | 12.22 | 139% |
| Returns for 3 years | 98.41 | 71.26 | 138% |
| Returns for 5 years | 77.74 | 45.63 | 170% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 111.15 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement