Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDSX vs SBFAX
FIDSX vs SBFAX Comparison
Open Charts FIDSX vs SBFAX
Fidelity Select Financials Port
Price$16.04
Change+$0.12 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.05B
1919 Financial Services A
Price$26.37
Change-$3.42 (-11.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.67M
FIDSX vs SBFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDSX vs. SBFAX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDSX is a StrongBuy and SBFAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDSX has more cash in the bank: 1.05B vs. SBFAX (106M). FIDSX pays higher dividends than SBFAX: FIDSX (1.64) vs SBFAX (0.07). FIDSX was incepted earlier than SBFAX: FIDSX (44 years) vs SBFAX (27 years). SBFAX (1.46) is less costly to investors than FIDSX (0.69). FIDSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. SBFAX (4.00). FIDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBFAX: FIDSX (0) vs SBFAX (1000). FIDSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.73 vs. SBFAX (-12.42). FIDSX return over 5 years is better than : 65.20 vs. SBFAX (-6.16).
| FIDSX | SBFAX | FIDSX / SBFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.46 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.46 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.252 | -0.265 | -473% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.05B | 106M | 988% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.64 | 0.07 | 2,318% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.73 | -12.42 | -38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.25 | -10.09 | -439% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.20 | -6.16 | -1,059% |
| Returns for 10 years | 144.94 | 59.53 | 243% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement