Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDSX vs RMBNX
FIDSX vs RMBNX Comparison
Open Charts FIDSX vs RMBNX
Fidelity Select Financials Port
Price$14.93
Change-$0.34 (-2.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.05B
RMB Mendon Financial Services C
Price$39.20
Change-$1.00 (-2.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets197.94M
FIDSX vs RMBNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDSX vs. RMBNX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDSX is a StrongBuy and RMBNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDSX has more cash in the bank: 1.05B vs. RMBNX (198M). FIDSX pays higher dividends than RMBNX: FIDSX (1.42) vs RMBNX (0.75). FIDSX was incepted earlier than RMBNX: FIDSX (44 years) vs RMBNX (20 years). RMBNX (2.14) is less costly to investors than FIDSX (0.69). RMBNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FIDSX (35.00). FIDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBNX: FIDSX (0) vs RMBNX (2500). FIDSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.95 vs. RMBNX (17.75). FIDSX return over 5 years is better than : 102.65 vs. RMBNX (66.51).
| FIDSX | RMBNX | FIDSX / RMBNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 2.14 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 2.14 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.344 | -8.795 | -4% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.05B | 198M | 528% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.42 | 0.75 | 190% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.95 | 17.75 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.84 | -5.64 | -937% |
| Returns for 5 years | 102.65 | 66.51 | 154% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.82 | 43.32 | 187% |