Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDSX vs RMBNX
FIDSX vs RMBNX Comparison
Open Charts FIDSX vs RMBNX
Fidelity Select Financials Port
Price$15.86
Change-$0.21 (-1.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.09B
RMB Mendon Financial Services C
Price$42.61
Change-$0.45 (-1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets213.78M
FIDSX vs RMBNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDSX vs. RMBNX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDSX is a Buy and RMBNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDSX has more cash in the bank: 1.09B vs. RMBNX (214M). FIDSX pays higher dividends than RMBNX: FIDSX (1.36) vs RMBNX (0.72). FIDSX was incepted earlier than RMBNX: FIDSX (44 years) vs RMBNX (20 years). RMBNX (2.14) is less costly to investors than FIDSX (0.69). RMBNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FIDSX (35.00). FIDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBNX: FIDSX (0) vs RMBNX (2500). FIDSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.99 vs. RMBNX (9.27). FIDSX return over 5 years is better than : 108.34 vs. RMBNX (67.77).
| FIDSX | RMBNX | FIDSX / RMBNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 2.14 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 2.14 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.594 | -0.861 | -766% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.09B | 214M | 510% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.36 | 0.72 | 188% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.99 | 9.27 | 194% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.25 | -10.19 | -395% |
| Returns for 5 years | 108.34 | 67.77 | 160% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.48 | 48.08 | 194% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement