Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDSX vs RMBNX
FIDSX vs RMBNX Comparison
Open Charts FIDSX vs RMBNX
Fidelity Select Financials Port
Price$15.94
Change-$0.21 (-1.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1B
RMB Mendon Financial Services C
Price$43.67
Change-$0.25 (-0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets217.56M
FIDSX vs RMBNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDSX vs. RMBNX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDSX is a Buy and RMBNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDSX has more cash in the bank: 1B vs. RMBNX (218M). FIDSX pays higher dividends than RMBNX: FIDSX (1.37) vs RMBNX (0.70). FIDSX was incepted earlier than RMBNX: FIDSX (44 years) vs RMBNX (21 years). RMBNX (2.14) is less costly to investors than FIDSX (0.69). RMBNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FIDSX (35.00). FIDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBNX: FIDSX (0) vs RMBNX (2500). FIDSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.66 vs. RMBNX (-5.78). FIDSX return over 5 years is better than : 90.59 vs. RMBNX (39.41).
| FIDSX | RMBNX | FIDSX / RMBNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 2.14 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 2.14 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.871 | 2.187 | 360% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1B | 218M | 460% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 0.70 | 194% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.66 | -5.78 | -11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.40 | -5.29 | -802% |
| Returns for 5 years | 90.59 | 39.41 | 230% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.31 | 44.45 | 244% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement