Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDSX vs RMBNX
FIDSX vs RMBNX Comparison
Open Charts FIDSX vs RMBNX
Fidelity Select Financials Port
Price$15.59
Change+$0.13 (+0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.07B
RMB Mendon Financial Services C
Price$41.57
Change+$0.31 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets206.43M
FIDSX vs RMBNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDSX vs. RMBNX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDSX is a Buy and RMBNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDSX has more cash in the bank: 1.07B vs. RMBNX (206M). FIDSX pays higher dividends than RMBNX: FIDSX (1.32) vs RMBNX (0.69). FIDSX was incepted earlier than RMBNX: FIDSX (44 years) vs RMBNX (20 years). RMBNX (2.14) is less costly to investors than FIDSX (0.69). RMBNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FIDSX (35.00). FIDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBNX: FIDSX (0) vs RMBNX (2500). FIDSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.26 vs. RMBNX (-3.05). FIDSX return over 5 years is better than : 104.06 vs. RMBNX (54.37).
| FIDSX | RMBNX | FIDSX / RMBNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 2.14 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 2.14 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.780 | -3.281 | -146% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.07B | 206M | 519% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.32 | 0.69 | 192% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.26 | -3.05 | -107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.47 | -5.77 | -858% |
| Returns for 5 years | 104.06 | 54.37 | 191% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.66 | 43.01 | 241% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers