Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDSX vs RMBNX
FIDSX vs RMBNX Comparison
Open Charts FIDSX vs RMBNX
Fidelity Select Financials Port
Price$16.29
Change-$0.88 (-5.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.02B
RMB Mendon Financial Services C
Price$45.68
Change-$0.09 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets234.75M
FIDSX vs RMBNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDSX vs. RMBNX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDSX is a Hold and RMBNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDSX has more cash in the bank: 1.02B vs. RMBNX (235M). FIDSX pays higher dividends than RMBNX: FIDSX (1.33) vs RMBNX (0.66). FIDSX was incepted earlier than RMBNX: FIDSX (44 years) vs RMBNX (21 years). RMBNX (2.14) is less costly to investors than FIDSX (0.69). RMBNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FIDSX (35.00). FIDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBNX: FIDSX (0) vs RMBNX (2500). FIDSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.44 vs. RMBNX (5.20). FIDSX return over 5 years is better than : 85.10 vs. RMBNX (33.52).
| FIDSX | RMBNX | FIDSX / RMBNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 2.14 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 2.14 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.399 | 6.282 | 245% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.02B | 235M | 433% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.33 | 0.66 | 202% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.44 | 5.20 | 181% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.21 | 27.11 | 248% |
| Returns for 5 years | 85.10 | 33.52 | 254% |
| Returns for 10 years | 123.77 | 52.26 | 237% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement