Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDSX vs RMBNX
FIDSX vs RMBNX Comparison
Open Charts FIDSX vs RMBNX
Fidelity Select Financials Port
Price$16.04
Change+$0.12 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.05B
RMB Mendon Financial Services C
Price$47.97
Change+$4.37 (+10.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets245.26M
FIDSX vs RMBNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDSX vs. RMBNX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDSX is a StrongBuy and RMBNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDSX has more cash in the bank: 1.05B vs. RMBNX (245M). FIDSX pays higher dividends than RMBNX: FIDSX (1.64) vs RMBNX (0.39). FIDSX was incepted earlier than RMBNX: FIDSX (44 years) vs RMBNX (21 years). RMBNX (2.14) is less costly to investors than FIDSX (0.69). RMBNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FIDSX (35.00). FIDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBNX: FIDSX (0) vs RMBNX (2500). RMBNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.09 vs. FIDSX (4.73). FIDSX return over 5 years is better than : 65.20 vs. RMBNX (27.95).
| FIDSX | RMBNX | FIDSX / RMBNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 2.14 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 2.14 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.252 | 6.128 | 20% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.05B | 245M | 427% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.64 | 0.39 | 420% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.73 | 11.09 | 43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.25 | 26.95 | 164% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.20 | 27.95 | 233% |
| Returns for 10 years | 144.94 | 82.70 | 175% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement