Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDSX vs RMBLX
FIDSX vs RMBLX Comparison
Open Charts FIDSX vs RMBLX
Fidelity Select Financials Port
Price$16.29
Change-$0.88 (-5.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.02B
RMB Mendon Financial Services I
Price$55.04
Change-$0.11 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets235.09M
FIDSX vs RMBLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDSX vs. RMBLX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDSX is a Hold and RMBLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDSX has more cash in the bank: 1.02B vs. RMBLX (235M). FIDSX (1.33) and RMBLX (1.28) have matching dividends . FIDSX was incepted earlier than RMBLX: FIDSX (44 years) vs RMBLX (9 years). RMBLX (1.14) is less costly to investors than FIDSX (0.69). RMBLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FIDSX (35.00). FIDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBLX: FIDSX (0) vs RMBLX (100000). FIDSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.50 vs. RMBLX (6.58). FIDSX return over 5 years is better than : 85.10 vs. RMBLX (44.50).
| FIDSX | RMBLX | FIDSX / RMBLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.14 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.14 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.399 | 7.647 | 201% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.02B | 235M | 433% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.33 | 1.28 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.50 | 6.58 | 205% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.21 | 31.55 | 213% |
| Returns for 5 years | 85.10 | 44.50 | 191% |
| Returns for 10 years | 122.38 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement