Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDSX vs RMBLX
FIDSX vs RMBLX Comparison
Open Charts FIDSX vs RMBLX
Fidelity Select Financials Port
Price$15.59
Change+$0.13 (+0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.07B
RMB Mendon Financial Services I
Price$49.85
Change+$0.38 (+0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets208.19M
FIDSX vs RMBLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDSX vs. RMBLX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDSX is a Buy and RMBLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDSX has more cash in the bank: 1.07B vs. RMBLX (208M). RMBLX (1.34) and FIDSX (1.32) have matching dividends . FIDSX was incepted earlier than RMBLX: FIDSX (44 years) vs RMBLX (9 years). RMBLX (1.14) is less costly to investors than FIDSX (0.69). RMBLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FIDSX (35.00). FIDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBLX: FIDSX (0) vs RMBLX (100000). FIDSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.26 vs. RMBLX (-1.94). FIDSX return over 5 years is better than : 104.06 vs. RMBLX (66.63).
| FIDSX | RMBLX | FIDSX / RMBLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.14 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.14 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.780 | -2.503 | -191% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.07B | 208M | 514% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.32 | 1.34 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.26 | -1.94 | -168% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.47 | -0.41 | -12,170% |
| Returns for 5 years | 104.06 | 66.63 | 156% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.66 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement