Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDSX vs RMBLX
FIDSX vs RMBLX Comparison
Open Charts FIDSX vs RMBLX
Fidelity Select Financials Port
Price$16.19
Change-$0.23 (-1.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.09B
RMB Mendon Financial Services I
Price$53.81
Change-$0.33 (-0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets224.23M
FIDSX vs RMBLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDSX vs. RMBLX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDSX is a Buy and RMBLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDSX has more cash in the bank: 1.09B vs. RMBLX (224M). FIDSX (1.31) and RMBLX (1.30) have matching dividends . FIDSX was incepted earlier than RMBLX: FIDSX (44 years) vs RMBLX (9 years). RMBLX (1.14) is less costly to investors than FIDSX (0.69). RMBLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FIDSX (35.00). FIDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBLX: FIDSX (0) vs RMBLX (100000). FIDSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.09 vs. RMBLX (13.36). FIDSX return over 5 years is better than : 111.91 vs. RMBLX (90.32).
| FIDSX | RMBLX | FIDSX / RMBLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.14 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.14 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.812 | 5.242 | 168% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.09B | 224M | 485% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 1.30 | 101% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.09 | 13.36 | 128% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.93 | 11.32 | 494% |
| Returns for 5 years | 111.91 | 90.32 | 124% |
| Returns for 10 years | 113.72 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement