Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDSX vs RMBLX
FIDSX vs RMBLX Comparison
Open Charts FIDSX vs RMBLX
Fidelity Select Financials Port
Price$15.94
Change-$0.21 (-1.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1B
RMB Mendon Financial Services I
Price$52.41
Change-$0.30 (-0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets216.27M
FIDSX vs RMBLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDSX vs. RMBLX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDSX is a Buy and RMBLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDSX has more cash in the bank: 1B vs. RMBLX (216M). RMBLX (1.37) and FIDSX (1.37) have matching dividends . FIDSX was incepted earlier than RMBLX: FIDSX (44 years) vs RMBLX (9 years). RMBLX (1.14) is less costly to investors than FIDSX (0.69). RMBLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FIDSX (35.00). FIDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBLX: FIDSX (0) vs RMBLX (100000). FIDSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.66 vs. RMBLX (-4.68). FIDSX return over 5 years is better than : 91.78 vs. RMBLX (50.45).
| FIDSX | RMBLX | FIDSX / RMBLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.14 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.14 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.543 | 3.090 | 276% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1B | 216M | 464% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 1.37 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.66 | -4.68 | -35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.24 | 0.10 | 43,237% |
| Returns for 5 years | 91.78 | 50.45 | 182% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.99 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement