Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDSX vs RMBKX
FIDSX vs RMBKX Comparison
Open Charts FIDSX vs RMBKX
Fidelity Select Financials Port
Price$16.27
Change+$0.24 (+1.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.02B
RMB Mendon Financial Services A
Price$54.34
Change+$1.19 (+2.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets227.36M
FIDSX vs RMBKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDSX vs. RMBKX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDSX is a Buy and RMBKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDSX has more cash in the bank: 1.02B vs. RMBKX (227M). FIDSX pays higher dividends than RMBKX: FIDSX (1.33) vs RMBKX (1.09). FIDSX was incepted earlier than RMBKX: FIDSX (44 years) vs RMBKX (27 years). RMBKX (1.39) is less costly to investors than FIDSX (0.69). RMBKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FIDSX (35.00). FIDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBKX: FIDSX (0) vs RMBKX (2500). RMBKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.39 vs. FIDSX (0.12). FIDSX return over 5 years is better than : 77.68 vs. RMBKX (46.36).
| FIDSX | RMBKX | FIDSX / RMBKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.39 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.39 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.350 | 8.789 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.02B | 227M | 448% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.33 | 1.09 | 122% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.12 | 0.39 | 30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.48 | 5.07 | 877% |
| Returns for 5 years | 77.68 | 46.36 | 168% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.27 | 64.59 | 161% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers