Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDSX vs RMBKX
FIDSX vs RMBKX Comparison
Open Charts FIDSX vs RMBKX
Fidelity Select Financials Port
Price$16.19
Change-$0.23 (-1.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.09B
RMB Mendon Financial Services A
Price$52.47
Change-$0.33 (-0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets225.91M
FIDSX vs RMBKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDSX vs. RMBKX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDSX is a Buy and RMBKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDSX has more cash in the bank: 1.09B vs. RMBKX (226M). FIDSX pays higher dividends than RMBKX: FIDSX (1.31) vs RMBKX (1.11). FIDSX was incepted earlier than RMBKX: FIDSX (44 years) vs RMBKX (26 years). RMBKX (1.39) is less costly to investors than FIDSX (0.69). RMBKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FIDSX (35.00). FIDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBKX: FIDSX (0) vs RMBKX (2500). FIDSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.09 vs. RMBKX (13.05). FIDSX return over 5 years is better than : 111.91 vs. RMBKX (87.35).
| FIDSX | RMBKX | FIDSX / RMBKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.39 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.39 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.812 | 5.045 | 175% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.09B | 226M | 481% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 1.11 | 119% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.09 | 13.05 | 131% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.93 | 10.13 | 552% |
| Returns for 5 years | 111.91 | 87.35 | 128% |
| Returns for 10 years | 113.72 | 79.51 | 143% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement