Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDSX vs RMBKX
FIDSX vs RMBKX Comparison
Open Charts FIDSX vs RMBKX
Fidelity Select Financials Port
Price$15.59
Change+$0.13 (+0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.07B
RMB Mendon Financial Services A
Price$48.60
Change+$0.45 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets206.43M
FIDSX vs RMBKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDSX vs. RMBKX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDSX is a Buy and RMBKX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDSX has more cash in the bank: 1.07B vs. RMBKX (206M). FIDSX pays higher dividends than RMBKX: FIDSX (1.32) vs RMBKX (1.14). FIDSX was incepted earlier than RMBKX: FIDSX (44 years) vs RMBKX (26 years). RMBKX (1.39) is less costly to investors than FIDSX (0.69). RMBKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FIDSX (35.00). FIDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBKX: FIDSX (0) vs RMBKX (2500). FIDSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.40 vs. RMBKX (-2.21). FIDSX return over 5 years is better than : 102.36 vs. RMBKX (64.00).
| FIDSX | RMBKX | FIDSX / RMBKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.39 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.39 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.906 | -2.703 | -145% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.07B | 206M | 519% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.32 | 1.14 | 116% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.40 | -2.21 | -109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.23 | -1.46 | -3,298% |
| Returns for 5 years | 102.36 | 64.00 | 160% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.96 | 60.20 | 169% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers