Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDSX vs RMBKX
FIDSX vs RMBKX Comparison
Open Charts FIDSX vs RMBKX
Fidelity Select Financials Port
Price$16.13
Change+$0.11 (+0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.09B
RMB Mendon Financial Services A
Price$49.83
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets214.21M
FIDSX vs RMBKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDSX vs. RMBKX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDSX is a StrongBuy and RMBKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDSX has more cash in the bank: 1.09B vs. RMBKX (214M). FIDSX pays higher dividends than RMBKX: FIDSX (1.36) vs RMBKX (1.21). FIDSX was incepted earlier than RMBKX: FIDSX (44 years) vs RMBKX (26 years). RMBKX (1.39) is less costly to investors than FIDSX (0.69). RMBKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FIDSX (35.00). FIDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBKX: FIDSX (0) vs RMBKX (2500). FIDSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.52 vs. RMBKX (5.54). FIDSX return over 5 years is better than : 120.57 vs. RMBKX (93.42).
| FIDSX | RMBKX | FIDSX / RMBKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.39 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.39 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.409 | -0.240 | -3,500% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.09B | 214M | 508% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.36 | 1.21 | 112% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.52 | 5.54 | 334% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.64 | 2.50 | 2,263% |
| Returns for 5 years | 120.57 | 93.42 | 129% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.49 | 70.03 | 139% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement