Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDSX vs RMBKX
FIDSX vs RMBKX Comparison
Open Charts FIDSX vs RMBKX
Fidelity Select Financials Port
Price$15.99
Change-$0.02 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.05B
RMB Mendon Financial Services A
Price$54.28
Change+$0.85 (+1.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets232.84M
FIDSX vs RMBKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDSX vs. RMBKX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDSX is a Hold and RMBKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDSX has more cash in the bank: 1.05B vs. RMBKX (233M). FIDSX pays higher dividends than RMBKX: FIDSX (1.65) vs RMBKX (0.89). FIDSX was incepted earlier than RMBKX: FIDSX (44 years) vs RMBKX (27 years). RMBKX (1.39) is less costly to investors than FIDSX (0.69). RMBKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FIDSX (35.00). FIDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBKX: FIDSX (0) vs RMBKX (2500). RMBKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.27 vs. FIDSX (9.33). FIDSX return over 5 years is better than : 63.41 vs. RMBKX (33.86).
| FIDSX | RMBKX | FIDSX / RMBKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.39 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.39 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.250 | 2.164 | 12% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.05B | 233M | 450% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.65 | 0.89 | 185% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.33 | 12.27 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.34 | 30.38 | 159% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.41 | 33.86 | 187% |
| Returns for 10 years | 137.45 | 93.11 | 148% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement