Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDSX vs FSRBX
FIDSX vs FSRBX Comparison
Open Charts FIDSX vs FSRBX
Fidelity Select Financials Port
Price$16.19
Change-$0.23 (-1.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.09B
Fidelity Select Banking
Price$34.41
Change-$0.41 (-1.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets449.36M
FIDSX vs FSRBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDSX vs. FSRBX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDSX is a Buy and FSRBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDSX has more cash in the bank: 1.09B vs. FSRBX (449M). FSRBX pays higher dividends than FIDSX: FSRBX (1.97) vs FIDSX (1.31). FIDSX was incepted earlier than FSRBX: FIDSX (44 years) vs FSRBX (39 years). FSRBX (0.71) and FIDSX (0.69) have similar cost to investors . FIDSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FSRBX (31.00). FIDSX (0) and FSRBX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSRBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.31 vs. FIDSX (17.09). FSRBX return over 5 years is better than : 118.80 vs. FIDSX (111.91).
| FIDSX | FSRBX | FIDSX / FSRBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.71 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.71 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.812 | 10.798 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.09B | 449M | 242% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 1.97 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.09 | 20.31 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.93 | 46.78 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 111.91 | 118.80 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 113.72 | 51.58 | 220% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement