Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDSX vs FSRBX
FIDSX vs FSRBX Comparison
Open Charts FIDSX vs FSRBX
Fidelity Select Financials Port
Price$15.99
Change-$0.02 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.05B
Fidelity Select Banking
Price$34.44
Change-$0.08 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets459.18M
FIDSX vs FSRBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDSX vs. FSRBX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDSX is a Hold and FSRBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDSX has more cash in the bank: 1.05B vs. FSRBX (459M). FSRBX pays higher dividends than FIDSX: FSRBX (2.29) vs FIDSX (1.65). FIDSX was incepted earlier than FSRBX: FIDSX (44 years) vs FSRBX (40 years). FSRBX (0.71) and FIDSX (0.69) have similar cost to investors . FIDSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FSRBX (31.00). FIDSX (0) and FSRBX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSRBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.32 vs. FIDSX (9.33). FIDSX return over 5 years is better than : 63.41 vs. FSRBX (58.67).
| FIDSX | FSRBX | FIDSX / FSRBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.71 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.71 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.250 | 1.619 | 15% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.05B | 459M | 229% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.65 | 2.29 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.33 | 11.32 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.34 | 44.60 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.41 | 58.67 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 137.45 | 78.70 | 175% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement