Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDSX vs FRBAX
FIDSX vs FRBAX Comparison
Open Charts FIDSX vs FRBAX
Fidelity Select Financials Port
Price$15.94
Change-$0.21 (-1.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1B
JHancock Regional Bank A
Price$29.22
Change-$0.24 (-0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets809.51M
FIDSX vs FRBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDSX vs. FRBAX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDSX is a Buy and FRBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDSX has more cash in the bank: 1B vs. FRBAX (810M). FRBAX pays higher dividends than FIDSX: FRBAX (1.61) vs FIDSX (1.37). FIDSX was incepted earlier than FRBAX: FIDSX (44 years) vs FRBAX (34 years). FRBAX (1.27) is less costly to investors than FIDSX (0.69). FIDSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FRBAX (3.00). FIDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FRBAX: FIDSX (0) vs FRBAX (1000). FIDSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.66 vs. FRBAX (-10.12). FIDSX return over 5 years is better than : 90.59 vs. FRBAX (42.00).
| FIDSX | FRBAX | FIDSX / FRBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.26 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.27 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.871 | 4.533 | 174% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1B | 810M | 124% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 1.61 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.66 | -10.12 | -6% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.40 | 2.45 | 1,729% |
| Returns for 5 years | 90.59 | 42.00 | 216% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.31 | 62.59 | 173% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement