Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDSX vs FRBAX
FIDSX vs FRBAX Comparison
Open Charts FIDSX vs FRBAX
Fidelity Select Financials Port
Price$16.03
Change-$0.03 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.02B
JHancock Regional Bank A
Price$30.26
Change-$0.14 (-0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets822.63M
FIDSX vs FRBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDSX vs. FRBAX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDSX is a Buy and FRBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDSX has more cash in the bank: 1.02B vs. FRBAX (823M). FRBAX pays higher dividends than FIDSX: FRBAX (1.53) vs FIDSX (1.33). FIDSX was incepted earlier than FRBAX: FIDSX (44 years) vs FRBAX (34 years). FRBAX (1.27) is less costly to investors than FIDSX (0.69). FIDSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FRBAX (3.00). FIDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FRBAX: FIDSX (0) vs FRBAX (1000). FIDSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.77 vs. FRBAX (-8.25). FIDSX return over 5 years is better than : 78.21 vs. FRBAX (38.34).
| FIDSX | FRBAX | FIDSX / FRBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.26 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.27 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.939 | 7.869 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.02B | 823M | 124% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.33 | 1.53 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.77 | -8.25 | 21% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.61 | 6.56 | 650% |
| Returns for 5 years | 78.21 | 38.34 | 204% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.63 | 62.18 | 163% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement