FIDS
Price
$21.00
Change
+$0.01 (+0.05%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
14.53M
FMOO
Price
$65.60
Change
+$3.24 (+5.20%)
Updated
Mar 10 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

FIDS vs FMOO

Header iconFIDS vs FMOO Comparison
Open Charts FIDS vs FMOOBanner chart's image
FNB
Price$21.00
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
Volume$402
Capitalization14.53M
F&M Ban
Price$65.60
Change+$3.24 (+5.20%)
Volume$212
CapitalizationN/A
FIDS vs FMOO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FIDS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FMOO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FIDS vs. FMOO commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDS is a Hold and FMOO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (FIDS: $21.00 vs. FMOO: $64.80)
Brand notoriety: FIDS and FMOO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FIDS: 45% vs. FMOO: 100%
Market capitalization -- FIDS: $14.53M vs. FMOO: $0
FIDS [@Regional Banks] is valued at $14.53M. FMOO’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FIDS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFMOO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FIDS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FMOO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FIDS is a better buy in the long-term than FMOO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FIDS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FMOO’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FIDS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FMOO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FMOO is a better buy in the short-term than FIDS.

Price Growth

FIDS (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.05% price change this week, while FMOO (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.61% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.92%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.42% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMOO YTD gains are higher at: 5.196 vs. FIDS (-7.185).
FIDSFMOOFIDS / FMOO
Capitalization14.5MN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-7.1855.196-138%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue7.97MN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt2.1MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FIDS vs FMOO: Fundamental Ratings
FIDS
FMOO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5099
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
6
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
88100
SMR RATING
1..100
61100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5753
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a45

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FMOO's Valuation (6) in the null industry is in the same range as FIDS (28). This means that FMOO’s stock grew similarly to FIDS’s over the last 12 months.

FIDS's Profit vs Risk Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as FMOO (100). This means that FIDS’s stock grew similarly to FMOO’s over the last 12 months.

FIDS's SMR Rating (61) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FMOO (100). This means that FIDS’s stock grew somewhat faster than FMOO’s over the last 12 months.

FMOO's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as FIDS (57). This means that FMOO’s stock grew similarly to FIDS’s over the last 12 months.

FIDS's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FMOO (100). This means that FIDS’s stock grew significantly faster than FMOO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FIDSFMOO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
15%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
28%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
25%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
37%
N/A
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
23%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
28%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FIDS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FMOO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MCARY9.070.06
+0.67%
Mercari Inc.
ATCD1181.00N/A
N/A
Altair Corp.
CTYP5.30N/A
N/A
Community Bankers (PA)
BMDPF8.52N/A
N/A
Banca Monte Dei Paschi S.p.a.
XNGSY31.81-0.07
-0.22%
ENN Energy Holdings Ltd.

FIDS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FIDS and HRGG have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FIDS and HRGG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FIDS
1D Price
Change %
FIDS100%
N/A
HRGG - FIDS
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BKUTK - FIDS
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.56%
HMLN - FIDS
7%
Poorly correlated
-4.20%
DSBX - FIDS
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HONT - FIDS
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FMOO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FMOO and UNIF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FMOO and UNIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FMOO
1D Price
Change %
FMOO100%
N/A
UNIF - FMOO
23%
Poorly correlated
+4.92%
FGFI - FMOO
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CTYP - FMOO
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HMLN - FMOO
2%
Poorly correlated
-4.20%
FIDS - FMOO
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More