Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDCX vs SBFAX
FIDCX vs SBFAX Comparison
Open Charts FIDCX vs SBFAX
JHancock Financial Industries C
Price$15.21
Change+$0.13 (+0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets282.08M
1919 Financial Services A
Price$28.74
Change+$0.25 (+0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.28M
FIDCX vs SBFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDCX vs. SBFAX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDCX is a Buy and SBFAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDCX has more cash in the bank: 282M vs. SBFAX (110M). SBFAX pays higher dividends than FIDCX: SBFAX (0.64) vs FIDCX (0.52). FIDCX was incepted earlier than SBFAX: FIDCX (27 years) vs SBFAX (27 years). FIDCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than SBFAX (1.46). FIDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. SBFAX (4.00). FIDCX (1000) and SBFAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FIDCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.14 vs. SBFAX (-9.16). SBFAX return over 5 years is better than : 31.31 vs. FIDCX (4.76).
| FIDCX | SBFAX | FIDCX / SBFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 1.46 | 135% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 1.46 | 136% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.862 | -0.931 | -93% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 282M | 110M | 256% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 0.64 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.14 | -9.16 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.62 | 2.59 | 333% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.76 | 31.31 | 15% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.74 | 47.26 | 2% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers