Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDCX vs RMBNX
FIDCX vs RMBNX Comparison
Open Charts FIDCX vs RMBNX
JHancock Financial Industries C
Price$15.21
Change+$0.13 (+0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets284.46M
RMB Mendon Financial Services C
Price$41.57
Change+$0.31 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets206.43M
FIDCX vs RMBNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDCX vs. RMBNX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDCX is a Buy and RMBNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDCX has more cash in the bank: 284M vs. RMBNX (206M). RMBNX pays higher dividends than FIDCX: RMBNX (0.69) vs FIDCX (0.52). FIDCX was incepted earlier than RMBNX: FIDCX (27 years) vs RMBNX (20 years). RMBNX (2.14) is less costly to investors than FIDCX (1.98). RMBNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FIDCX (61.00). FIDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBNX: FIDCX (1000) vs RMBNX (2500). RMBNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.05 vs. FIDCX (-7.14). RMBNX return over 5 years is better than : 54.37 vs. FIDCX (4.76).
| FIDCX | RMBNX | FIDCX / RMBNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 2.14 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 2.14 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.862 | -3.281 | -26% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 284M | 206M | 138% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 0.69 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.14 | -3.05 | 234% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.62 | -5.77 | -150% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.76 | 54.37 | 9% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.74 | 43.01 | 2% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers