Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDCX vs RMBNX
FIDCX vs RMBNX Comparison
Open Charts FIDCX vs RMBNX
JHancock Financial Industries C
Price$15.14
Change-$0.32 (-2.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets292.41M
RMB Mendon Financial Services C
Price$39.20
Change-$1.00 (-2.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets197.94M
FIDCX vs RMBNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDCX vs. RMBNX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDCX is a Hold and RMBNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDCX has more cash in the bank: 292M vs. RMBNX (198M). RMBNX pays higher dividends than FIDCX: RMBNX (0.75) vs FIDCX (0.53). FIDCX was incepted earlier than RMBNX: FIDCX (26 years) vs RMBNX (20 years). RMBNX (2.14) is less costly to investors than FIDCX (1.98). RMBNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FIDCX (61.00). FIDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBNX: FIDCX (1000) vs RMBNX (2500). RMBNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.75 vs. FIDCX (10.48). RMBNX return over 5 years is better than : 66.51 vs. FIDCX (11.33).
| FIDCX | RMBNX | FIDCX / RMBNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 2.14 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 2.14 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.398 | -8.795 | -5% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 292M | 198M | 147% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.75 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.48 | 17.75 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.87 | -5.64 | -228% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.33 | 66.51 | 17% |
| Returns for 10 years | -7.26 | 43.32 | -17% |