Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDCX vs RMBNX
FIDCX vs RMBNX Comparison
Open Charts FIDCX vs RMBNX
JHancock Financial Industries C
Price$16.02
Change+$0.02 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets308.12M
RMB Mendon Financial Services C
Price$42.70
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets214.21M
FIDCX vs RMBNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDCX vs. RMBNX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDCX is a StrongBuy and RMBNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDCX has more cash in the bank: 308M vs. RMBNX (214M). RMBNX pays higher dividends than FIDCX: RMBNX (0.73) vs FIDCX (0.52). FIDCX was incepted earlier than RMBNX: FIDCX (26 years) vs RMBNX (20 years). RMBNX (2.14) is less costly to investors than FIDCX (1.98). RMBNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FIDCX (61.00). FIDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBNX: FIDCX (1000) vs RMBNX (2500). FIDCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.04 vs. RMBNX (4.63). RMBNX return over 5 years is better than : 82.14 vs. FIDCX (14.94).
| FIDCX | RMBNX | FIDCX / RMBNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 2.14 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 2.14 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.233 | -0.651 | -957% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 308M | 214M | 144% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 0.73 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.04 | 4.63 | 174% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.45 | -1.96 | -840% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.94 | 82.14 | 18% |
| Returns for 10 years | -1.12 | 51.76 | -2% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers