Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDCX vs RMBLX
FIDCX vs RMBLX Comparison
Open Charts FIDCX vs RMBLX
JHancock Financial Industries C
Price$15.70
Change-$0.22 (-1.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets295.06M
RMB Mendon Financial Services I
Price$52.57
Change+$0.16 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets216.27M
FIDCX vs RMBLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDCX vs. RMBLX commentary
Nov 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDCX is a Buy and RMBLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDCX has more cash in the bank: 295M vs. RMBLX (216M). RMBLX pays higher dividends than FIDCX: RMBLX (1.37) vs FIDCX (0.53). FIDCX was incepted earlier than RMBLX: FIDCX (27 years) vs RMBLX (9 years). FIDCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than RMBLX (1.14). RMBLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FIDCX (61.00). FIDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBLX: FIDCX (1000) vs RMBLX (100000). RMBLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.80 vs. FIDCX (-9.12). RMBLX return over 5 years is better than : 49.60 vs. FIDCX (-0.32).
| FIDCX | RMBLX | FIDCX / RMBLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 1.14 | 173% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 1.14 | 174% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.111 | 2.503 | 164% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 295M | 216M | 137% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 1.37 | 39% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.12 | -4.80 | 190% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.10 | -0.01 | -92,240% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.32 | 49.60 | -1% |
| Returns for 10 years | 1.97 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers