Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDCX vs RMBLX
FIDCX vs RMBLX Comparison
Open Charts FIDCX vs RMBLX
JHancock Financial Industries C
Price$15.21
Change+$0.13 (+0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets284.46M
RMB Mendon Financial Services I
Price$49.85
Change+$0.38 (+0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets208.19M
FIDCX vs RMBLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDCX vs. RMBLX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDCX is a Buy and RMBLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDCX has more cash in the bank: 284M vs. RMBLX (208M). RMBLX pays higher dividends than FIDCX: RMBLX (1.34) vs FIDCX (0.52). FIDCX was incepted earlier than RMBLX: FIDCX (27 years) vs RMBLX (9 years). FIDCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than RMBLX (1.14). RMBLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FIDCX (61.00). FIDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBLX: FIDCX (1000) vs RMBLX (100000). RMBLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.94 vs. FIDCX (-7.14). RMBLX return over 5 years is better than : 66.63 vs. FIDCX (4.76).
| FIDCX | RMBLX | FIDCX / RMBLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 1.14 | 173% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 1.14 | 174% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.862 | -2.503 | -34% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 284M | 208M | 137% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 1.34 | 38% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.14 | -1.94 | 368% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.62 | -0.41 | -2,122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.76 | 66.63 | 7% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.74 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers