Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDCX vs RMBLX
FIDCX vs RMBLX Comparison
Open Charts FIDCX vs RMBLX
JHancock Financial Industries C
Price$10.51
Change+$0.09 (+0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets283.44M
RMB Mendon Financial Services I
Price$58.67
Change+$0.80 (+1.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets245.32M
FIDCX vs RMBLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDCX vs. RMBLX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDCX is a Buy and RMBLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDCX has more cash in the bank: 283M vs. RMBLX (245M). RMBLX pays higher dividends than FIDCX: RMBLX (1.07) vs FIDCX (0.26). FIDCX was incepted earlier than RMBLX: FIDCX (27 years) vs RMBLX (9 years). FIDCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than RMBLX (1.14). RMBLX (66.00) and FIDCX (63.00) have comparable annual turnover. FIDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBLX: FIDCX (1000) vs RMBLX (100000). RMBLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.32 vs. FIDCX (-33.56). RMBLX return over 5 years is better than : 41.03 vs. FIDCX (-36.90).
| FIDCX | RMBLX | FIDCX / RMBLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 1.14 | 173% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 1.14 | 174% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.940 | 7.691 | 25% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 283M | 245M | 116% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.26 | 1.07 | 25% |
| Returns for 1 year | -33.56 | 12.32 | -272% |
| Returns for 3 years | -19.97 | 34.11 | -59% |
| Returns for 5 years | -36.90 | 41.03 | -90% |
| Returns for 10 years | -19.05 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers