Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDCX vs RMBLX
FIDCX vs RMBLX Comparison
Open Charts FIDCX vs RMBLX
JHancock Financial Industries C
Price$15.28
Change+$0.14 (+0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets292.41M
RMB Mendon Financial Services I
Price$46.92
Change+$0.07 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets197.94M
FIDCX vs RMBLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDCX vs. RMBLX commentary
Jun 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDCX is a Hold and RMBLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDCX has more cash in the bank: 292M vs. RMBLX (198M). RMBLX pays higher dividends than FIDCX: RMBLX (1.45) vs FIDCX (0.53). FIDCX was incepted earlier than RMBLX: FIDCX (26 years) vs RMBLX (8 years). FIDCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than RMBLX (1.14). RMBLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FIDCX (61.00). FIDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBLX: FIDCX (1000) vs RMBLX (100000). RMBLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.08 vs. FIDCX (10.48). RMBLX return over 5 years is better than : 79.72 vs. FIDCX (11.33).
| FIDCX | RMBLX | FIDCX / RMBLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 1.14 | 173% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 1.14 | 174% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.398 | -8.371 | -5% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 292M | 198M | 147% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 1.45 | 36% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.48 | 19.08 | 55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.87 | -0.26 | -5,025% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.33 | 79.72 | 14% |
| Returns for 10 years | -7.26 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement