Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDCX vs RMBLX
FIDCX vs RMBLX Comparison
Open Charts FIDCX vs RMBLX
JHancock Financial Industries C
Price$16.08
Change+$0.13 (+0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets302.59M
RMB Mendon Financial Services I
Price$52.99
Change+$0.26 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets221.2M
FIDCX vs RMBLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDCX vs. RMBLX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDCX is a Hold and RMBLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDCX has more cash in the bank: 303M vs. RMBLX (221M). RMBLX pays higher dividends than FIDCX: RMBLX (1.30) vs FIDCX (0.51). FIDCX was incepted earlier than RMBLX: FIDCX (27 years) vs RMBLX (9 years). FIDCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than RMBLX (1.14). RMBLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FIDCX (61.00). FIDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBLX: FIDCX (1000) vs RMBLX (100000). RMBLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.41 vs. FIDCX (4.86). RMBLX return over 5 years is better than : 108.08 vs. FIDCX (19.61).
| FIDCX | RMBLX | FIDCX / RMBLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 1.14 | 173% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 1.14 | 174% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.631 | 3.638 | 182% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 303M | 221M | 137% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 1.30 | 39% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.86 | 10.41 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.20 | 11.47 | 194% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.61 | 108.08 | 18% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.27 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers