Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDCX vs RMBLX
FIDCX vs RMBLX Comparison
Open Charts FIDCX vs RMBLX
JHancock Financial Industries C
Price$10.51
Change-$0.02 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets294.87M
RMB Mendon Financial Services I
Price$55.04
Change-$0.11 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets235.09M
FIDCX vs RMBLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDCX vs. RMBLX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDCX is a Hold and RMBLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDCX has more cash in the bank: 295M vs. RMBLX (235M). RMBLX pays higher dividends than FIDCX: RMBLX (1.28) vs FIDCX (0.52). FIDCX was incepted earlier than RMBLX: FIDCX (27 years) vs RMBLX (9 years). FIDCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than RMBLX (1.14). RMBLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FIDCX (61.00). FIDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBLX: FIDCX (1000) vs RMBLX (100000). RMBLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.58 vs. FIDCX (-31.40). RMBLX return over 5 years is better than : 44.50 vs. FIDCX (-33.76).
| FIDCX | RMBLX | FIDCX / RMBLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 1.14 | 173% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 1.14 | 174% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -30.305 | 7.647 | -396% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 295M | 235M | 126% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 1.28 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | -31.40 | 6.58 | -477% |
| Returns for 3 years | -15.40 | 31.55 | -49% |
| Returns for 5 years | -33.76 | 44.50 | -76% |
| Returns for 10 years | -31.22 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement