Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDCX vs RMBLX
FIDCX vs RMBLX Comparison
Open Charts FIDCX vs RMBLX
JHancock Financial Industries C
Price$16.18
Change+$0.17 (+1.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets311.81M
RMB Mendon Financial Services I
Price$51.60
Change+$0.59 (+1.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets217.04M
FIDCX vs RMBLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDCX vs. RMBLX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDCX is a StrongBuy and RMBLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDCX has more cash in the bank: 312M vs. RMBLX (217M). RMBLX pays higher dividends than FIDCX: RMBLX (1.42) vs FIDCX (0.52). FIDCX was incepted earlier than RMBLX: FIDCX (26 years) vs RMBLX (8 years). FIDCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than RMBLX (1.14). RMBLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FIDCX (61.00). FIDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBLX: FIDCX (1000) vs RMBLX (100000). RMBLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.27 vs. FIDCX (14.65). RMBLX return over 5 years is better than : 104.46 vs. FIDCX (19.67).
| FIDCX | RMBLX | FIDCX / RMBLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 1.14 | 173% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 1.14 | 174% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.294 | 0.919 | 794% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 312M | 217M | 144% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 1.42 | 36% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.65 | 25.27 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.57 | 8.72 | 224% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.67 | 104.46 | 19% |
| Returns for 10 years | 1.49 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers