Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDCX vs RMBKX
FIDCX vs RMBKX Comparison
Open Charts FIDCX vs RMBKX
JHancock Financial Industries C
Price$15.71
Change-$0.17 (-1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets298.08M
RMB Mendon Financial Services A
Price$49.74
Change-$0.53 (-1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets213.78M
FIDCX vs RMBKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDCX vs. RMBKX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDCX is a Buy and RMBKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDCX has more cash in the bank: 298M vs. RMBKX (214M). RMBKX pays higher dividends than FIDCX: RMBKX (1.20) vs FIDCX (0.52). FIDCX was incepted earlier than RMBKX: FIDCX (26 years) vs RMBKX (26 years). FIDCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than RMBKX (1.39). RMBKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FIDCX (61.00). FIDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBKX: FIDCX (1000) vs RMBKX (2500). RMBKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.22 vs. FIDCX (7.10). RMBKX return over 5 years is better than : 78.21 vs. FIDCX (8.06).
| FIDCX | RMBKX | FIDCX / RMBKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 1.39 | 142% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 1.39 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.178 | -0.420 | -994% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 298M | 214M | 139% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 1.20 | 44% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.10 | 10.22 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.10 | -6.09 | -67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.06 | 78.21 | 10% |
| Returns for 10 years | -2.80 | 65.85 | -4% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers