Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDCX vs RMBKX
FIDCX vs RMBKX Comparison
Open Charts FIDCX vs RMBKX
JHancock Financial Industries C
Price$15.21
Change+$0.13 (+0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets282.08M
RMB Mendon Financial Services A
Price$48.60
Change+$0.45 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets206.43M
FIDCX vs RMBKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDCX vs. RMBKX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDCX is a Buy and RMBKX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDCX has more cash in the bank: 282M vs. RMBKX (206M). RMBKX pays higher dividends than FIDCX: RMBKX (1.14) vs FIDCX (0.52). FIDCX was incepted earlier than RMBKX: FIDCX (27 years) vs RMBKX (26 years). FIDCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than RMBKX (1.39). RMBKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FIDCX (61.00). FIDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBKX: FIDCX (1000) vs RMBKX (2500). RMBKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.21 vs. FIDCX (-7.14). RMBKX return over 5 years is better than : 64.00 vs. FIDCX (4.76).
| FIDCX | RMBKX | FIDCX / RMBKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 1.39 | 142% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 1.39 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.862 | -2.703 | -32% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 282M | 206M | 137% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 1.14 | 45% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.14 | -2.21 | 324% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.62 | -1.46 | -590% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.76 | 64.00 | 7% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.74 | 60.20 | 1% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers