Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDCX vs RMBKX
FIDCX vs RMBKX Comparison
Open Charts FIDCX vs RMBKX
JHancock Financial Industries C
Price$16.05
Change+$0.19 (+1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets294.62M
RMB Mendon Financial Services A
Price$54.34
Change+$1.19 (+2.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets227.36M
FIDCX vs RMBKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDCX vs. RMBKX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDCX is a Buy and RMBKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDCX has more cash in the bank: 295M vs. RMBKX (227M). RMBKX pays higher dividends than FIDCX: RMBKX (1.09) vs FIDCX (0.52). FIDCX was incepted earlier than RMBKX: FIDCX (27 years) vs RMBKX (27 years). FIDCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than RMBKX (1.39). RMBKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FIDCX (61.00). FIDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBKX: FIDCX (1000) vs RMBKX (2500). RMBKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.39 vs. FIDCX (-8.82). RMBKX return over 5 years is better than : 46.36 vs. FIDCX (-2.82).
| FIDCX | RMBKX | FIDCX / RMBKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 1.39 | 142% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 1.39 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.432 | 8.789 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 295M | 227M | 130% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 1.09 | 47% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.82 | 0.39 | -2,251% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.89 | 5.07 | 156% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.82 | 46.36 | -6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.40 | 64.59 | 4% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers