Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDCX vs RMBKX
FIDCX vs RMBKX Comparison
Open Charts FIDCX vs RMBKX
JHancock Financial Industries C
Price$16.02
Change+$0.02 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets308.12M
RMB Mendon Financial Services A
Price$49.83
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets214.21M
FIDCX vs RMBKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDCX vs. RMBKX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDCX is a StrongBuy and RMBKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDCX has more cash in the bank: 308M vs. RMBKX (214M). RMBKX pays higher dividends than FIDCX: RMBKX (1.21) vs FIDCX (0.52). FIDCX was incepted earlier than RMBKX: FIDCX (26 years) vs RMBKX (26 years). FIDCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than RMBKX (1.39). RMBKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FIDCX (61.00). FIDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBKX: FIDCX (1000) vs RMBKX (2500). FIDCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.04 vs. RMBKX (5.54). RMBKX return over 5 years is better than : 93.42 vs. FIDCX (14.94).
| FIDCX | RMBKX | FIDCX / RMBKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 1.39 | 142% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 1.39 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.233 | -0.240 | -2,595% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 308M | 214M | 144% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 1.21 | 43% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.04 | 5.54 | 145% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.45 | 2.50 | 657% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.94 | 93.42 | 16% |
| Returns for 10 years | -1.12 | 70.03 | -2% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers