Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDCX vs RMBKX
FIDCX vs RMBKX Comparison
Open Charts FIDCX vs RMBKX
JHancock Financial Industries C
Price$10.53
Change+$0.04 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets294.89M
RMB Mendon Financial Services A
Price$53.79
Change+$0.06 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets234.81M
FIDCX vs RMBKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDCX vs. RMBKX commentary
Dec 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDCX is a Hold and RMBKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDCX has more cash in the bank: 295M vs. RMBKX (235M). RMBKX pays higher dividends than FIDCX: RMBKX (1.09) vs FIDCX (0.52). FIDCX was incepted earlier than RMBKX: FIDCX (27 years) vs RMBKX (27 years). FIDCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than RMBKX (1.39). RMBKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FIDCX (61.00). FIDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBKX: FIDCX (1000) vs RMBKX (2500). RMBKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.45 vs. FIDCX (-31.04). RMBKX return over 5 years is better than : 42.66 vs. FIDCX (-33.63).
| FIDCX | RMBKX | FIDCX / RMBKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 1.39 | 142% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 1.39 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -30.172 | 7.688 | -392% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 295M | 235M | 126% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 1.09 | 47% |
| Returns for 1 year | -31.04 | 7.45 | -417% |
| Returns for 3 years | -15.23 | 30.60 | -50% |
| Returns for 5 years | -33.63 | 42.66 | -79% |
| Returns for 10 years | -30.79 | 72.59 | -42% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers