Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDCX vs RMBKX
FIDCX vs RMBKX Comparison
Open Charts FIDCX vs RMBKX
JHancock Financial Industries C
Price$15.88
Change-$0.25 (-1.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets304.71M
RMB Mendon Financial Services A
Price$52.47
Change-$0.33 (-0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets225.91M
FIDCX vs RMBKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDCX vs. RMBKX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDCX is a Buy and RMBKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDCX has more cash in the bank: 305M vs. RMBKX (226M). RMBKX pays higher dividends than FIDCX: RMBKX (1.11) vs FIDCX (0.51). FIDCX was incepted earlier than RMBKX: FIDCX (27 years) vs RMBKX (26 years). FIDCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than RMBKX (1.39). RMBKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FIDCX (61.00). FIDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBKX: FIDCX (1000) vs RMBKX (2500). RMBKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.05 vs. FIDCX (5.40). RMBKX return over 5 years is better than : 87.35 vs. FIDCX (10.55).
| FIDCX | RMBKX | FIDCX / RMBKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 1.39 | 142% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 1.39 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.305 | 5.045 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 305M | 226M | 135% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 1.11 | 46% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.40 | 13.05 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.70 | 10.13 | 145% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.55 | 87.35 | 12% |
| Returns for 10 years | 5.24 | 79.51 | 7% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers