Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDCX vs HSSCX
FIDCX vs HSSCX Comparison
Open Charts FIDCX vs HSSCX
JHancock Financial Industries C
Price$15.42
Change+$0.21 (+1.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets284.46M
Emerald Finance & Bking Innovt Fd C
Price$24.84
Change+$0.73 (+3.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.43M
FIDCX vs HSSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDCX vs. HSSCX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDCX is a Buy and HSSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDCX has more cash in the bank: 284M vs. HSSCX (47.4M). FIDCX pays higher dividends than HSSCX: FIDCX (0.52) vs HSSCX (0.00). FIDCX was incepted earlier than HSSCX: FIDCX (27 years) vs HSSCX (25 years). HSSCX (2.44) is less costly to investors than FIDCX (1.98). FIDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. HSSCX (32.00). FIDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSSCX: FIDCX (1000) vs HSSCX (2000). HSSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.01 vs. FIDCX (-7.14). HSSCX return over 5 years is better than : 10.81 vs. FIDCX (4.76).
| FIDCX | HSSCX | FIDCX / HSSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 2.44 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 2.44 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.862 | 6.399 | 13% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 284M | 47.4M | 599% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.14 | 5.01 | -143% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.62 | 27.99 | 31% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.76 | 10.81 | 44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.74 | -5.37 | -14% |