Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDAX vs RMBNX
FIDAX vs RMBNX Comparison
Open Charts FIDAX vs RMBNX
JHancock Financial Industries A
Price$18.33
Change+$0.16 (+0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets284.46M
RMB Mendon Financial Services C
Price$41.57
Change+$0.31 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets206.43M
FIDAX vs RMBNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDAX vs. RMBNX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDAX is a Buy and RMBNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDAX has more cash in the bank: 284M vs. RMBNX (206M). FIDAX pays higher dividends than RMBNX: FIDAX (1.08) vs RMBNX (0.69). FIDAX was incepted earlier than RMBNX: FIDAX (30 years) vs RMBNX (20 years). RMBNX (2.14) is less costly to investors than FIDAX (1.28). RMBNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FIDAX (61.00). FIDAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBNX: FIDAX (1000) vs RMBNX (2500). RMBNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.05 vs. FIDAX (-4.91). RMBNX return over 5 years is better than : 54.37 vs. FIDAX (14.45).
| FIDAX | RMBNX | FIDAX / RMBNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 2.14 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 2.14 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.495 | -3.281 | -46% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 284M | 206M | 138% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 0.69 | 156% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.91 | -3.05 | 161% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.98 | -5.77 | -242% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.45 | 54.37 | 27% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.76 | 43.01 | 37% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers