Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDAX vs RMBNX
FIDAX vs RMBNX Comparison
Open Charts FIDAX vs RMBNX
JHancock Financial Industries A
Price$13.90
Change-$0.02 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets295.39M
RMB Mendon Financial Services C
Price$45.68
Change-$0.09 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets234.75M
FIDAX vs RMBNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDAX vs. RMBNX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDAX is a Hold and RMBNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDAX has more cash in the bank: 295M vs. RMBNX (235M). FIDAX pays higher dividends than RMBNX: FIDAX (1.08) vs RMBNX (0.66). FIDAX was incepted earlier than RMBNX: FIDAX (30 years) vs RMBNX (21 years). RMBNX (2.14) is less costly to investors than FIDAX (1.28). RMBNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FIDAX (61.00). FIDAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBNX: FIDAX (1000) vs RMBNX (2500). RMBNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.20 vs. FIDAX (-23.89). RMBNX return over 5 years is better than : 33.52 vs. FIDAX (-20.47).
| FIDAX | RMBNX | FIDAX / RMBNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 2.14 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 2.14 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -22.924 | 6.282 | -365% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 295M | 235M | 126% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 0.66 | 163% |
| Returns for 1 year | -23.89 | 5.20 | -459% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.41 | 27.11 | -13% |
| Returns for 5 years | -20.47 | 33.52 | -61% |
| Returns for 10 years | -12.24 | 52.26 | -23% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers