Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDAX vs RMBNX
FIDAX vs RMBNX Comparison
Open Charts FIDAX vs RMBNX
JHancock Financial Industries A
Price$13.79
Change-$5.06 (-26.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets283.44M
RMB Mendon Financial Services C
Price$47.97
Change+$4.37 (+10.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets245.26M
FIDAX vs RMBNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDAX vs. RMBNX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDAX is a Buy and RMBNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDAX has more cash in the bank: 283M vs. RMBNX (245M). FIDAX pays higher dividends than RMBNX: FIDAX (0.90) vs RMBNX (0.39). FIDAX was incepted earlier than RMBNX: FIDAX (30 years) vs RMBNX (21 years). RMBNX (2.14) is less costly to investors than FIDAX (1.28). RMBNX (66.00) and FIDAX (63.00) have comparable annual turnover. FIDAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBNX: FIDAX (1000) vs RMBNX (2500). RMBNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.09 vs. FIDAX (-26.92). RMBNX return over 5 years is better than : 27.95 vs. FIDAX (-24.29).
| FIDAX | RMBNX | FIDAX / RMBNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 2.14 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 2.14 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.174 | 6.128 | 19% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 283M | 245M | 116% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 0.39 | 230% |
| Returns for 1 year | -26.92 | 11.09 | -243% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.02 | 26.95 | -33% |
| Returns for 5 years | -24.29 | 27.95 | -87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.45 | 82.70 | 3% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers