Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDAX vs RMBLX
FIDAX vs RMBLX Comparison
Open Charts FIDAX vs RMBLX
JHancock Financial Industries A
Price$19.37
Change+$0.24 (+1.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets294.62M
RMB Mendon Financial Services I
Price$55.76
Change+$1.22 (+2.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets227.36M
FIDAX vs RMBLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDAX vs. RMBLX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDAX is a Buy and RMBLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDAX has more cash in the bank: 295M vs. RMBLX (227M). RMBLX pays higher dividends than FIDAX: RMBLX (1.28) vs FIDAX (1.08). FIDAX was incepted earlier than RMBLX: FIDAX (30 years) vs RMBLX (9 years). FIDAX (1.28) is less costly to investors than RMBLX (1.14). RMBLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FIDAX (61.00). FIDAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBLX: FIDAX (1000) vs RMBLX (100000). RMBLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.70 vs. FIDAX (-8.28). RMBLX return over 5 years is better than : 50.61 vs. FIDAX (6.46).
| FIDAX | RMBLX | FIDAX / RMBLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 1.14 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 1.14 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.035 | 7.530 | 80% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 295M | 227M | 130% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 1.28 | 84% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.28 | -1.70 | 487% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.92 | 4.72 | 252% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.46 | 50.61 | 13% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.46 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement