Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDAX vs FSRBX
FIDAX vs FSRBX Comparison
Open Charts FIDAX vs FSRBX
JHancock Financial Industries A
Price$13.79
Change-$5.06 (-26.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets283.44M
Fidelity Select Banking
Price$36.56
Change+$2.66 (+7.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets479.65M
FIDAX vs FSRBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDAX vs. FSRBX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDAX is a Buy and FSRBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSRBX has more cash in the bank: 480M vs. FIDAX (283M). FSRBX pays higher dividends than FIDAX: FSRBX (2.20) vs FIDAX (0.90). FIDAX was incepted earlier than FSRBX: FIDAX (30 years) vs FSRBX (40 years). FIDAX (1.28) is less costly to investors than FSRBX (0.71). FIDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. FSRBX (31.00). FSRBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FIDAX: FSRBX (0) vs FIDAX (1000). FSRBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.26 vs. FIDAX (-26.92). FSRBX return over 5 years is better than : 66.17 vs. FIDAX (-24.29).
| FIDAX | FSRBX | FIDAX / FSRBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.71 | 179% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.71 | 180% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.174 | 6.035 | 19% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 283M | 480M | 59% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 2.20 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | -26.92 | 13.26 | -203% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.02 | 43.17 | -21% |
| Returns for 5 years | -24.29 | 66.17 | -37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.45 | 91.24 | 3% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers