Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDAX vs FSRBX
FIDAX vs FSRBX Comparison
Open Charts FIDAX vs FSRBX
JHancock Financial Industries A
Price$19.37
Change+$0.16 (+0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets302.59M
Fidelity Select Banking
Price$34.84
Change+$0.24 (+0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets449.36M
FIDAX vs FSRBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDAX vs. FSRBX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDAX is a Hold and FSRBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSRBX has more cash in the bank: 449M vs. FIDAX (303M). FSRBX pays higher dividends than FIDAX: FSRBX (1.97) vs FIDAX (1.07). FIDAX was incepted earlier than FSRBX: FIDAX (30 years) vs FSRBX (39 years). FIDAX (1.28) is less costly to investors than FSRBX (0.71). FIDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FSRBX (31.00). FSRBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FIDAX: FSRBX (0) vs FIDAX (1000). FSRBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.61 vs. FIDAX (7.37). FSRBX return over 5 years is better than : 148.67 vs. FIDAX (30.67).
| FIDAX | FSRBX | FIDAX / FSRBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.71 | 179% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.71 | 180% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.254 | 12.182 | 60% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 303M | 449M | 67% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 1.97 | 54% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.37 | 21.61 | 34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.19 | 55.59 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.67 | 148.67 | 21% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.11 | 59.19 | 49% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers