Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDAX vs FRBCX
FIDAX vs FRBCX Comparison
Open Charts FIDAX vs FRBCX
JHancock Financial Industries A
Price$13.79
Change-$5.06 (-26.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets283.44M
JHancock Regional Bank C
Price$29.59
Change+$2.15 (+7.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets889.97M
FIDAX vs FRBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDAX vs. FRBCX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDAX is a Buy and FRBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRBCX has more cash in the bank: 890M vs. FIDAX (283M). FRBCX pays higher dividends than FIDAX: FRBCX (0.98) vs FIDAX (0.90). FIDAX was incepted earlier than FRBCX: FIDAX (30 years) vs FRBCX (27 years). FRBCX (1.97) is less costly to investors than FIDAX (1.28). FIDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. FRBCX (5.00). FIDAX (1000) and FRBCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FRBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.97 vs. FIDAX (-26.92). FRBCX return over 5 years is better than : 20.74 vs. FIDAX (-24.29).
| FIDAX | FRBCX | FIDAX / FRBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 1.96 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 1.97 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.174 | 8.907 | 13% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 283M | 890M | 32% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 0.98 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | -26.92 | 8.97 | -300% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.02 | 13.51 | -67% |
| Returns for 5 years | -24.29 | 20.74 | -117% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.45 | 96.40 | 3% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers