Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FICWX vs HBLCX
FICWX vs HBLCX Comparison
Open Charts FICWX vs HBLCX
American Funds Retire Inc Port-Cnsrv F3
Price$12.98
Change+$0.01 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.36B
Hartford Balanced Income C
Price$14.44
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.68B
FICWX vs HBLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FICWX vs. HBLCX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FICWX is a Hold and HBLCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLCX has more cash in the bank: 11.7B vs. FICWX (1.36B). FICWX pays higher dividends than HBLCX: FICWX (3.33) vs HBLCX (2.54). FICWX was incepted earlier than HBLCX: FICWX (9 years) vs HBLCX (19 years). HBLCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than FICWX (0.30). HBLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FICWX (12.00). HBLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FICWX: HBLCX (2000) vs FICWX (1000000). FICWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.30 vs. HBLCX (5.42). FICWX return over 5 years is better than : 26.07 vs. HBLCX (5.57).
| FICWX | HBLCX | FICWX / HBLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.64 | 18% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.64 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.780 | 5.817 | 237% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 2000 | - |
| Net Assets | 1.36B | 11.7B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.33 | 2.54 | 131% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.30 | 5.42 | 246% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.62 | 14.84 | 200% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.07 | 5.57 | 468% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 34.92 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement