Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FICWX vs HBLAX
FICWX vs HBLAX Comparison
Open Charts FICWX vs HBLAX
American Funds Retire Inc Port-Cnsrv F3
Price$12.66
Change-$0.05 (-0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.32B
Hartford Balanced Income A
Price$14.95
Change-$0.07 (-0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.82B
FICWX vs HBLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FICWX vs. HBLAX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FICWX is a Hold and HBLAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 11.8B vs. FICWX (1.32B). FICWX (3.40) and HBLAX (3.28) have matching dividends . FICWX was incepted earlier than HBLAX: FICWX (9 years) vs HBLAX (19 years). HBLAX (0.89) is less costly to investors than FICWX (0.30). HBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FICWX (12.00). HBLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FICWX: HBLAX (2000) vs FICWX (1000000). FICWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.41 vs. HBLAX (1.92). FICWX return over 5 years is better than : 27.41 vs. HBLAX (18.29).
| FICWX | HBLAX | FICWX / HBLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.89 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.89 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.974 | 8.144 | 135% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 2000 | - |
| Net Assets | 1.32B | 11.8B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.40 | 3.28 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.41 | 1.92 | 438% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.22 | 25.18 | 136% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.41 | 18.29 | 150% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 50.10 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement