Intraday BUY SELL Signals
20 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FICS vs SAN
FICS vs SAN Comparison
Open Charts FICS vs SAN
First Trust Intl Developed Cap Strth ETF
Price$40.37
Change-$0.09 (-0.22%)
Volume$600
Net Assets220.88M
Banco Santander SA
Price$12.26
Change+$0.04 (+0.33%)
Volume$14.03K
Capitalization179.38B
FICS vs SAN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FICS vs. SAN commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FICS is a Hold and SAN is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SAN: Fundamental Ratings
SAN | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 82 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 83 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 2 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 2 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 9 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FICS | SAN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 48% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 50% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 55% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 81% | 9 days ago 54% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 51% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FICS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FICS has been closely correlated with SLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FICS jumps, then SLF could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FICS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FICS | 100% | +0.52% | ||
| SLF - FICS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.86% | ||
| BMO - FICS | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.78% | ||
| TD - FICS | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.21% | ||
| SAN - FICS | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.25% | ||
| GSK - FICS | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.78% | ||
More | ||||
SAN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAN has been closely correlated with BBVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SAN jumps, then BBVA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SAN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAN | 100% | +0.25% | ||
| BBVA - SAN | 80% Closely correlated | -0.81% | ||
| BCS - SAN | 72% Closely correlated | +0.43% | ||
| ING - SAN | 71% Closely correlated | +0.55% | ||
| HSBC - SAN | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.29% | ||
| MUFG - SAN | 61% Loosely correlated | +3.83% | ||
More | ||||