Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FICS vs IMTM
FICS vs IMTM Comparison
Open Charts FICS vs IMTM
First Trust Intl Developed Cap Strth ETF
Price$39.34
Change+$0.02 (+0.05%)
Volume$10.65K
Net Assets223.85M
iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF
Price$45.32
Change+$0.13 (+0.29%)
Volume$563.29K
Net Assets3.05B
FICS vs IMTM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FICS vs. IMTM commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FICS is a Hold and IMTM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IMTM has more net assets: 3.05B vs. FICS (224M). IMTM has a higher annual dividend yield than FICS: IMTM (22.637) vs FICS (17.731). FICS was incepted earlier than IMTM: FICS (5 years) vs IMTM (10 years). IMTM (0.30) has a lower expense ratio than FICS (0.70). IMTM has a higher turnover FICS (58.00) vs FICS (58.00).
| FICS | IMTM | FICS / IMTM | |
| Gain YTD | 17.731 | 22.637 | 78% |
| Net Assets | 224M | 3.05B | 7% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.30 | 233% |
| Turnover | 58.00 | 70.00 | 83% |
| Yield | 2.31 | 2.44 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 10 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FICS | IMTM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 72% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 63% | 5 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 83% | 5 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 79% | 5 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 81% | 5 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 75% | 5 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 83% | 8 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 81% | 6 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 61% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 78% | 5 days ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FICS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FICS has been loosely correlated with RIO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FICS jumps, then RIO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FICS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FICS | 100% | +0.04% | ||
| RIO - FICS | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.93% | ||
| BHP - FICS | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.41% | ||
| L - FICS | 54% Loosely correlated | +1.15% | ||
| RKT - FICS | 52% Loosely correlated | -2.26% | ||
| TRI - FICS | 46% Loosely correlated | +1.21% | ||
More | ||||
IMTM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMTM has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IMTM jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IMTM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMTM | 100% | +0.29% | ||
| BN - IMTM | 73% Closely correlated | +2.67% | ||
| MFC - IMTM | 71% Closely correlated | +1.37% | ||
| NWG - IMTM | 69% Closely correlated | +3.31% | ||
| RY - IMTM | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.12% | ||
| BHP - IMTM | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.41% | ||
More | ||||