FICS | IMTM | FICS / IMTM | |
Gain YTD | 18.148 | 23.476 | 77% |
Net Assets | 226M | 3.13B | 7% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.30 | 233% |
Turnover | 58.00 | 70.00 | 83% |
Yield | 2.31 | 2.44 | 95% |
Fund Existence | 5 years | 11 years | - |
FICS | IMTM | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago86% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago63% | 3 days ago82% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago84% | 3 days ago83% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago76% | 3 days ago80% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% | 3 days ago80% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago77% | 3 days ago77% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago82% | 5 days ago79% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% | 3 days ago77% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago65% | 3 days ago56% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago76% | 3 days ago79% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
PRAY | 31.29 | 0.16 | +0.51% |
FIS Christian Stock ETF | |||
SABA | 9.31 | 0.03 | +0.32% |
Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II | |||
RMCA | 23.38 | 0.07 | +0.30% |
Rockefeller California Municipal Bd ETF | |||
EMIF | 24.02 | N/A | N/A |
iShares Emerging Markets Infras ETF | |||
YINN | 46.96 | -0.98 | -2.04% |
Direxion Daily FTSE China Bull 3X ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FICS has been loosely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FICS jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FICS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FICS | 100% | -0.38% | ||
BHP - FICS | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.70% | ||
RIO - FICS | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.14% | ||
L - FICS | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.44% | ||
RKT - FICS | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.94% | ||
TRI - FICS | 46% Loosely correlated | -1.02% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMTM has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IMTM jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IMTM | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
IMTM | 100% | -0.02% | ||
BN - IMTM | 72% Closely correlated | +0.22% | ||
MFC - IMTM | 72% Closely correlated | +0.58% | ||
NWG - IMTM | 70% Closely correlated | +4.20% | ||
RY - IMTM | 67% Closely correlated | +0.02% | ||
AER - IMTM | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.15% | ||
More |