Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FICS vs IMTM
FICS vs IMTM Comparison
Open Charts FICS vs IMTM
First Trust Intl Developed Cap Strth ETF
Price$40.37
Change-$0.09 (-0.22%)
Volume$600
Net Assets220.88M
iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF
Price$50.25
Change+$0.20 (+0.40%)
Volume$200
Net Assets3.69B
FICS vs IMTM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FICS vs. IMTM commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FICS is a Hold and IMTM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IMTM has more net assets: 3.69B vs. FICS (221M). IMTM has a higher annual dividend yield than FICS: IMTM (4.336) vs FICS (0.874). FICS was incepted earlier than IMTM: FICS (5 years) vs IMTM (11 years). IMTM (0.30) has a lower expense ratio than FICS (0.70). IMTM has a higher turnover FICS (51.00) vs FICS (51.00).
| FICS | IMTM | FICS / IMTM | |
| Gain YTD | 0.874 | 4.336 | 20% |
| Net Assets | 221M | 3.69B | 6% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.30 | 233% |
| Turnover | 51.00 | 109.00 | 47% |
| Yield | 1.84 | 2.31 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 11 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FICS | IMTM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 81% | 30 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FICS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FICS has been closely correlated with SLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FICS jumps, then SLF could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FICS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FICS | 100% | +0.52% | ||
| SLF - FICS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.86% | ||
| BMO - FICS | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.78% | ||
| TD - FICS | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.21% | ||
| SAN - FICS | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.25% | ||
| GSK - FICS | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.78% | ||
More | ||||
IMTM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMTM has been closely correlated with SAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IMTM jumps, then SAN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IMTM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMTM | 100% | +0.14% | ||
| SAN - IMTM | 72% Closely correlated | +0.25% | ||
| MFC - IMTM | 71% Closely correlated | +1.47% | ||
| BN - IMTM | 70% Closely correlated | -0.04% | ||
| STM - IMTM | 70% Closely correlated | -1.93% | ||
| NWG - IMTM | 66% Closely correlated | +0.71% | ||
More | ||||