Intraday BUY SELL Signals
20 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FICS vs GSK
FICS vs GSK Comparison
Open Charts FICS vs GSK
First Trust Intl Developed Cap Strth ETF
Price$40.37
Change-$0.09 (-0.22%)
Volume$600
Net Assets220.88M
FICS vs GSK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FICS vs. GSK commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FICS is a Hold and GSK is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GSK: Fundamental Ratings
GSK | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 16 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 10 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 37 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 25 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 87 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 31 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FICS | GSK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 42% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 81% | 9 days ago 61% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 81% | 29 days ago 51% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 43% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FICS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FICS has been closely correlated with SLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FICS jumps, then SLF could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FICS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FICS | 100% | +0.52% | ||
| SLF - FICS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.86% | ||
| BMO - FICS | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.78% | ||
| TD - FICS | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.21% | ||
| SAN - FICS | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.25% | ||
| GSK - FICS | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.78% | ||
More | ||||
GSK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSK has been closely correlated with NVS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GSK jumps, then NVS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y