FICO
Price
$1518.78
Change
-$29.58 (-1.91%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
36.46B
37 days until earnings call
QTWO
Price
$74.86
Change
+$1.39 (+1.89%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
4.67B
30 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FICO vs QTWO

Header iconFICO vs QTWO Comparison
Open Charts FICO vs QTWOBanner chart's image
Fair Isaac
Price$1518.78
Change-$29.58 (-1.91%)
Volume$199.01K
Capitalization36.46B
Q2 Holdings
Price$74.86
Change+$1.39 (+1.89%)
Volume$893.24K
Capitalization4.67B
FICO vs QTWO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FICO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QTWO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FICO vs. QTWO commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FICO is a Buy and QTWO is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (FICO: $1518.78 vs. QTWO: $74.86)
Brand notoriety: FICO and QTWO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FICO: 62% vs. QTWO: 68%
Market capitalization -- FICO: $36.46B vs. QTWO: $4.67B
FICO [@Packaged Software] is valued at $36.46B. QTWO’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $4.67B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $305.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FICO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileQTWO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FICO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • QTWO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FICO is a better buy in the long-term than QTWO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FICO’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QTWO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FICO’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • QTWO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FICO is a better buy in the short-term than QTWO.

Price Growth

FICO (@Packaged Software) experienced а +2.81% price change this week, while QTWO (@Packaged Software) price change was -4.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -0.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +110.36%.

Reported Earning Dates

FICO is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

QTWO is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-0.14% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FICO($36.5B) has a higher market cap than QTWO($4.67B). QTWO has higher P/E ratio than FICO: QTWO (1247.67) vs FICO (59.42). FICO YTD gains are higher at: -23.715 vs. QTWO (-25.623). FICO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 909M vs. QTWO (77.5M). QTWO has more cash in the bank: 532M vs. FICO (189M). QTWO has less debt than FICO: QTWO (539M) vs FICO (2.8B). FICO has higher revenues than QTWO: FICO (1.93B) vs QTWO (743M).
FICOQTWOFICO / QTWO
Capitalization36.5B4.67B781%
EBITDA909M77.5M1,173%
Gain YTD-23.715-25.62393%
P/E Ratio59.421247.675%
Revenue1.93B743M260%
Total Cash189M532M36%
Total Debt2.8B539M520%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FICO vs QTWO: Fundamental Ratings
FICO
QTWO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
44100
SMR RATING
1..100
1192
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6280
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9055
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FICO's Valuation (93) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as QTWO (96) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FICO’s stock grew similarly to QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

FICO's Profit vs Risk Rating (44) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QTWO (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FICO’s stock grew somewhat faster than QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

FICO's SMR Rating (11) in the Packaged Software industry is significantly better than the same rating for QTWO (92) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FICO’s stock grew significantly faster than QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

FICO's Price Growth Rating (62) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as QTWO (80) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FICO’s stock grew similarly to QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

QTWO's P/E Growth Rating (55) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FICO (90) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that QTWO’s stock grew somewhat faster than FICO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FICOQTWO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FICO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QTWO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PMFPX24.360.25
+1.04%
Principal MidCap S&P 400 Index R5
MDVNX8.040.07
+0.88%
MassMutual Diversified Value R3
CEUFX62.770.20
+0.32%
American Funds EUPAC 529-F-1
SMNAX26.990.08
+0.30%
Steward Equity Market Neutral A
APDYX25.53-0.13
-0.51%
Artisan Developing World Advisor

FICO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FICO has been loosely correlated with WIX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FICO jumps, then WIX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FICO
1D Price
Change %
FICO100%
-1.91%
WIX - FICO
48%
Loosely correlated
+2.20%
CPAY - FICO
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.55%
PANW - FICO
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.08%
HUBS - FICO
45%
Loosely correlated
+2.19%
QTWO - FICO
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.89%
More

QTWO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QTWO has been closely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QTWO jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QTWO
1D Price
Change %
QTWO100%
+1.89%
FRSH - QTWO
69%
Closely correlated
+0.32%
HUBS - QTWO
63%
Loosely correlated
+2.19%
ALKT - QTWO
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.42%
WEAV - QTWO
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.57%
EVCM - QTWO
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.52%
More