FICO
Price
$1762.35
Change
-$16.36 (-0.92%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
41.78B
49 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PANW
Price
$193.63
Change
+$3.75 (+1.97%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
134.96B
82 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FICO vs PANW

Header iconFICO vs PANW Comparison
Open Charts FICO vs PANWBanner chart's image
Fair Isaac
Price$1762.35
Change-$16.36 (-0.92%)
Volume$146.47K
Capitalization41.78B
Palo Alto Networks
Price$193.63
Change+$3.75 (+1.97%)
Volume$5.49M
Capitalization134.96B
FICO vs PANW Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FICO vs. PANW commentary
Dec 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FICO is a StrongBuy and PANW is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 04, 2025
Stock price -- (FICO: $1778.81 vs. PANW: $189.84)
Brand notoriety: FICO: Not notable vs. PANW: Notable
FICO represents the Packaged Software, while PANW is part of the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FICO: 16% vs. PANW: 37%
Market capitalization -- FICO: $41.78B vs. PANW: $134.96B
FICO [@Packaged Software] is valued at $41.78B. PANW’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $134.96B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $279.62B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.55T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.22B. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $25.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FICO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePANW’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FICO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PANW’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PANW is a better buy in the long-term than FICO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FICO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PANW’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FICO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PANW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FICO is a better buy in the short-term than PANW.

Price Growth

FICO (@Packaged Software) experienced а -1.72% price change this week, while PANW (@Computer Communications) price change was +1.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +48.17%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +1.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.96%.

Reported Earning Dates

FICO is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2026.

PANW is expected to report earnings on Feb 24, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+1.22% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

@Computer Communications (+1.06% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PANW($135B) has a higher market cap than FICO($41.8B). PANW has higher P/E ratio than FICO: PANW (122.55) vs FICO (66.40). PANW YTD gains are higher at: 4.331 vs. FICO (-10.654). PANW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.94B vs. FICO (909M). PANW has more cash in the bank: 2.9B vs. FICO (189M). PANW has less debt than FICO: PANW (338M) vs FICO (2.8B). PANW has higher revenues than FICO: PANW (9.22B) vs FICO (1.93B).
FICOPANWFICO / PANW
Capitalization41.8B135B31%
EBITDA909M1.94B47%
Gain YTD-10.6544.331-246%
P/E Ratio66.40122.5554%
Revenue1.93B9.22B21%
Total Cash189M2.9B7%
Total Debt2.8B338M829%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FICO vs PANW: Fundamental Ratings
FICO
PANW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3613
SMR RATING
1..100
949
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4761
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
886
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PANW's Valuation (87) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as FICO (93) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that PANW’s stock grew similarly to FICO’s over the last 12 months.

PANW's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as FICO (36) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that PANW’s stock grew similarly to FICO’s over the last 12 months.

FICO's SMR Rating (9) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PANW (49) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that FICO’s stock grew somewhat faster than PANW’s over the last 12 months.

FICO's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as PANW (61) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that FICO’s stock grew similarly to PANW’s over the last 12 months.

PANW's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Computer Communications industry is significantly better than the same rating for FICO (88) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that PANW’s stock grew significantly faster than FICO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FICOPANW
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
41%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FICO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PANW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
YANG23.880.34
+1.44%
Direxion Daily FTSE China Bear 3X ETF
FDT78.110.04
+0.05%
First Trust Dev Mkts Ex-US AlphaDEX® ETF
EEM54.290.01
+0.02%
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
CIF1.74N/A
N/A
MFS Intermediate High Income Fund
HIMZ7.72-0.54
-6.58%
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF

FICO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FICO has been loosely correlated with WIX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FICO jumps, then WIX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FICO
1D Price
Change %
FICO100%
+0.57%
WIX - FICO
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.66%
CPAY - FICO
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.44%
COIN - FICO
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.30%
PANW - FICO
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.12%
COMP - FICO
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.66%
More

PANW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PANW has been closely correlated with CRWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PANW jumps, then CRWD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PANW
1D Price
Change %
PANW100%
+1.12%
CRWD - PANW
70%
Closely correlated
+2.60%
ZS - PANW
69%
Closely correlated
-0.67%
CYBR - PANW
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.05%
FTNT - PANW
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.38%
NOW - PANW
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.28%
More