Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FICIX vs RGEBX
FICIX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FICIX vs RGEBX
Cantor Fitzgerald Large Cap Fcs Cl R6
Price$15.47
Change-$0.29 (-1.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets622.69M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$83.30
Change-$1.87 (-2.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
FICIX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FICIX vs. RGEBX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FICIX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. FICIX (623M). FICIX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . FICIX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FICIX (13 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.09) is less costly to investors than FICIX (0.87). FICIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RGEBX (25.00). FICIX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: FICIX (0) vs RGEBX (250). FICIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.94 vs. RGEBX (8.10). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.65 vs. FICIX (3.97).
| FICIX | RGEBX | FICIX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.09 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.09 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.453 | 19.219 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 623M | 340B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.94 | 8.10 | 147% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.72 | 62.39 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.97 | 36.65 | 11% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.81 | 93.78 | 30% |