Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FICIX vs RGACX
FICIX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FICIX vs RGACX
Cantor Fitzgerald Large Cap Fcs Cl R6
Price$15.42
Change+$0.08 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets599M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$84.36
Change+$0.32 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.88B
FICIX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FICIX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FICIX is a Hold and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. FICIX (599M). RGACX pays higher dividends than FICIX: RGACX (0.07) vs FICIX (0.00). FICIX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FICIX (13 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FICIX (0.87). FICIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). FICIX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: FICIX (0) vs RGACX (250). FICIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.44 vs. RGACX (12.22). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 45.63 vs. FICIX (11.71).
| FICIX | RGACX | FICIX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.94 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.94 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.070 | 17.183 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 599M | 337B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.44 | 12.22 | 159% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.17 | 71.26 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.71 | 45.63 | 26% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.12 | 111.15 | 32% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement