Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FICIX vs RGACX
FICIX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FICIX vs RGACX
Cantor Fitzgerald Large Cap Fcs Cl R6
Price$14.63
Change-$0.07 (-0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets568.55M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$82.10
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
FICIX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FICIX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FICIX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. FICIX (569M). RGACX pays higher dividends than FICIX: RGACX (0.07) vs FICIX (0.00). FICIX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FICIX (12 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FICIX (0.87). FICIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). FICIX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: FICIX (0) vs RGACX (250). FICIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.27 vs. RGACX (14.08). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 41.95 vs. FICIX (2.87).
| FICIX | RGACX | FICIX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.94 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.94 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.021 | 14.044 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 569M | 329B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.27 | 14.08 | 130% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.82 | 41.19 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.87 | 41.95 | 7% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.44 | 83.68 | 21% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement