Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FICHX vs RGEBX
FICHX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FICHX vs RGEBX
Cantor Fitzgerald Large Cap Fcs Cl Inst
Price$13.18
Change-$0.22 (-1.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets502.4M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$74.89
Change-$0.91 (-1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets306.22B
FICHX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FICHX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FICHX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 306B vs. FICHX (502M). FICHX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . FICHX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FICHX (12 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.09) is less costly to investors than FICHX (0.94). FICHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RGEBX (25.00). FICHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: FICHX (0) vs RGEBX (250). FICHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.83 vs. RGEBX (7.68). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 45.42 vs. FICHX (6.02).
| FICHX | RGEBX | FICHX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.09 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.09 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.808 | 4.829 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 502M | 306B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.83 | 7.68 | 128% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.13 | 51.01 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.02 | 45.42 | 13% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.72 | 65.87 | 10% |