Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FICHX vs RGEBX
FICHX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FICHX vs RGEBX
Cantor Fitzgerald Large Cap Fcs Cl Inst
Price$15.01
Change-$0.07 (-0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets644.89M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$75.85
Change-$9.36 (-10.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
FICHX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FICHX vs. RGEBX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FICHX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. FICHX (645M). FICHX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . FICHX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FICHX (13 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than FICHX (0.94). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FICHX (29.00). FICHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: FICHX (0) vs RGEBX (250). FICHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.35 vs. RGEBX (1.80). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 9.88 vs. FICHX (-1.32).
| FICHX | RGEBX | FICHX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.08 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.08 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.267 | -1.057 | -25% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 645M | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.35 | 1.80 | 687% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.78 | 41.63 | 144% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.32 | 9.88 | -13% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.10 | 110.02 | 49% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers