Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FICHX vs RGEBX
FICHX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FICHX vs RGEBX
Cantor Fitzgerald Large Cap Fcs Cl Inst
Price$15.18
Change-$0.28 (-1.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets622.69M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$83.30
Change-$1.87 (-2.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
FICHX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FICHX vs. RGEBX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FICHX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. FICHX (623M). FICHX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . FICHX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FICHX (13 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.09) is less costly to investors than FICHX (0.94). FICHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RGEBX (25.00). FICHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: FICHX (0) vs RGEBX (250). FICHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.78 vs. RGEBX (5.91). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 33.65 vs. FICHX (2.75).
| FICHX | RGEBX | FICHX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.09 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.09 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.409 | 16.601 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 623M | 340B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.78 | 5.91 | 199% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.79 | 60.66 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.75 | 33.65 | 8% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.62 | 87.06 | 29% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement