Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FICHX vs RGAHX
FICHX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts FICHX vs RGAHX
Cantor Fitzgerald Large Cap Fcs Cl Inst
Price$15.18
Change-$0.28 (-1.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets622.69M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$86.13
Change-$1.92 (-2.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
FICHX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FICHX vs. RGAHX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FICHX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. FICHX (623M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than FICHX: RGAHX (0.44) vs FICHX (0.00). FICHX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: FICHX (13 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). FICHX (0.94) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). FICHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RGAHX (25.00). FICHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAHX: FICHX (0) vs RGAHX (250). FICHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.78 vs. RGAHX (9.02). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 40.79 vs. FICHX (2.75).
| FICHX | RGAHX | FICHX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.44 | 195% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.44 | 214% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.409 | 19.894 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 623M | 340B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.44 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.78 | 9.02 | 131% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.79 | 65.43 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.75 | 40.79 | 7% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.62 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement