Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FICHX vs RGAHX
FICHX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts FICHX vs RGAHX
Cantor Fitzgerald Large Cap Fcs Cl Inst
Price$14.99
Change+$0.10 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets602.03M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$86.76
Change+$0.18 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.3B
FICHX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FICHX vs. RGAHX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FICHX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. FICHX (602M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than FICHX: RGAHX (0.45) vs FICHX (0.00). FICHX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: FICHX (13 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). FICHX (0.94) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). FICHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RGAHX (25.00). FICHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAHX: FICHX (0) vs RGAHX (250). FICHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.38 vs. RGAHX (11.73). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 40.74 vs. FICHX (2.02).
| FICHX | RGAHX | FICHX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.44 | 195% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.44 | 214% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.927 | 18.137 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 602M | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.45 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.38 | 11.73 | 140% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.56 | 72.76 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.02 | 40.74 | 5% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.94 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement