Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FICHX vs RGAHX
FICHX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts FICHX vs RGAHX
Cantor Fitzgerald Large Cap Fcs Cl Inst
Price$13.82
Change+$0.12 (+0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets533.44M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$81.72
Change+$0.80 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.86B
FICHX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FICHX vs. RGAHX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FICHX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. FICHX (533M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than FICHX: RGAHX (0.47) vs FICHX (0.00). FICHX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: FICHX (12 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). FICHX (0.94) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). FICHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RGAHX (25.00). FICHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAHX: FICHX (0) vs RGAHX (250). FICHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.72 vs. RGAHX (10.98). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 50.13 vs. FICHX (5.66).
| FICHX | RGAHX | FICHX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.44 | 195% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.44 | 214% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.800 | 11.275 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 533M | 323B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.47 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.72 | 10.98 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.39 | 60.14 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.66 | 50.13 | 11% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.98 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement