Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FICHX vs RGAHX
FICHX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts FICHX vs RGAHX
Cantor Fitzgerald Large Cap Fcs Cl Inst
Price$13.18
Change-$0.22 (-1.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets502.4M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$77.22
Change-$0.93 (-1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets306.22B
FICHX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FICHX vs. RGAHX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FICHX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 306B vs. FICHX (502M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than FICHX: RGAHX (0.50) vs FICHX (0.00). FICHX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: FICHX (12 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). FICHX (0.94) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). FICHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RGAHX (25.00). FICHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAHX: FICHX (0) vs RGAHX (250). FICHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.83 vs. RGAHX (7.38). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 49.84 vs. FICHX (6.02).
| FICHX | RGAHX | FICHX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.44 | 195% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.44 | 214% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.808 | 5.147 | 55% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 502M | 306B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.83 | 7.38 | 133% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.13 | 53.85 | 49% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.02 | 49.84 | 12% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.72 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers