Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FICGX vs RGEBX
FICGX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FICGX vs RGEBX
Cantor Fitzgerald Large Cap Fcs Cl A
Price$12.31
Change-$0.20 (-1.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets502.4M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$74.89
Change-$0.91 (-1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets306.22B
FICGX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FICGX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FICGX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 306B vs. FICGX (502M). FICGX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . FICGX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FICGX (25 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). FICGX (1.17) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.09). FICGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RGEBX (25.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FICGX: RGEBX (250) vs FICGX (1000). FICGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.33 vs. RGEBX (7.68). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 45.42 vs. FICGX (1.20).
| FICGX | RGEBX | FICGX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.09 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.09 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.755 | 4.829 | 57% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 502M | 306B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.33 | 7.68 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.80 | 51.01 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.20 | 45.42 | 3% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.66 | 65.87 | -1% |