Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FICGX vs RGAHX
FICGX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts FICGX vs RGAHX
Cantor Fitzgerald Large Cap Fcs Cl A
Price$12.90
Change+$0.11 (+0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets533.44M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$81.72
Change+$0.80 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.86B
FICGX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FICGX vs. RGAHX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FICGX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. FICGX (533M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than FICGX: RGAHX (0.47) vs FICGX (0.00). FICGX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: FICGX (25 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). FICGX (1.17) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). FICGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RGAHX (25.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than FICGX: RGAHX (250) vs FICGX (1000). FICGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.08 vs. RGAHX (10.98). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 50.13 vs. FICGX (0.83).
| FICGX | RGAHX | FICGX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.44 | 266% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.44 | 266% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.679 | 11.275 | 68% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 533M | 323B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.47 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.08 | 10.98 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.91 | 60.14 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.83 | 50.13 | 2% |
| Returns for 10 years | 5.11 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement