Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FICGX vs RGAHX
FICGX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts FICGX vs RGAHX
Cantor Fitzgerald Large Cap Fcs Cl A
Price$13.98
Change-$0.27 (-1.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets634.45M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$87.59
Change-$1.37 (-1.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
FICGX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FICGX vs. RGAHX commentary
Dec 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FICGX is a Buy and RGAHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. FICGX (634M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than FICGX: RGAHX (0.44) vs FICGX (0.00). FICGX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: FICGX (25 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). FICGX (1.17) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). FICGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RGAHX (32.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than FICGX: RGAHX (250) vs FICGX (1000). FICGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.73 vs. RGAHX (6.96). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 34.15 vs. FICGX (-4.89).
| FICGX | RGAHX | FICGX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.44 | 266% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.44 | 266% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.948 | 21.133 | 90% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 634M | 339B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.44 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.73 | 6.96 | 197% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.34 | 69.28 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.89 | 34.15 | -14% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.61 | 103.33 | 18% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement