Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FICGX vs RGAHX
FICGX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts FICGX vs RGAHX
Cantor Fitzgerald Large Cap Fcs Cl A
Price$13.14
Change+$0.11 (+0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets558.03M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$83.30
Change+$0.28 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.1B
FICGX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FICGX vs. RGAHX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FICGX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. FICGX (558M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than FICGX: RGAHX (0.47) vs FICGX (0.00). FICGX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: FICGX (25 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). FICGX (1.17) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). FICGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RGAHX (25.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than FICGX: RGAHX (250) vs FICGX (1000). FICGX (18.27) and RGAHX (17.89) have marching annual gain over last year. RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 49.57 vs. FICGX (0.36).
| FICGX | RGAHX | FICGX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.44 | 266% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.44 | 266% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.683 | 13.426 | 72% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 558M | 328B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.47 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.27 | 17.89 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.45 | 58.90 | 43% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.36 | 49.57 | 1% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.38 | N/A | - |