Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FICGX vs RGAHX
FICGX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts FICGX vs RGAHX
Cantor Fitzgerald Large Cap Fcs Cl A
Price$14.15
Change-$0.26 (-1.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets622.69M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$86.13
Change-$1.92 (-2.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
FICGX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FICGX vs. RGAHX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FICGX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. FICGX (623M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than FICGX: RGAHX (0.44) vs FICGX (0.00). FICGX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: FICGX (25 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). FICGX (1.17) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). FICGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RGAHX (25.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than FICGX: RGAHX (250) vs FICGX (1000). FICGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.15 vs. RGAHX (9.02). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 40.79 vs. FICGX (-2.03).
| FICGX | RGAHX | FICGX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.44 | 266% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.44 | 266% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.114 | 19.894 | 91% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 623M | 340B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.44 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.15 | 9.02 | 124% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.24 | 65.43 | 46% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.03 | 40.79 | -5% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.91 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement