Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FICGX vs RGAHX
FICGX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts FICGX vs RGAHX
Cantor Fitzgerald Large Cap Fcs Cl A
Price$12.31
Change-$0.20 (-1.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets502.4M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$77.22
Change-$0.93 (-1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets306.22B
FICGX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FICGX vs. RGAHX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FICGX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 306B vs. FICGX (502M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than FICGX: RGAHX (0.50) vs FICGX (0.00). FICGX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: FICGX (25 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). FICGX (1.17) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). FICGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RGAHX (25.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than FICGX: RGAHX (250) vs FICGX (1000). FICGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.33 vs. RGAHX (7.38). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 49.84 vs. FICGX (1.20).
| FICGX | RGAHX | FICGX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.44 | 266% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.44 | 266% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.755 | 5.147 | 54% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 502M | 306B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.33 | 7.38 | 126% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.80 | 53.85 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.20 | 49.84 | 2% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.66 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement