Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FICGX vs RGACX
FICGX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FICGX vs RGACX
Cantor Fitzgerald Large Cap Fcs Cl A
Price$13.63
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets576.65M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.16
Change+$0.19 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
FICGX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FICGX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FICGX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. FICGX (577M). RGACX pays higher dividends than FICGX: RGACX (0.07) vs FICGX (0.00). FICGX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FICGX (25 years) vs RGACX (23 years). FICGX (1.17) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). FICGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than FICGX: RGACX (250) vs FICGX (1000). FICGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.62 vs. RGACX (17.83). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 40.02 vs. FICGX (-0.89).
| FICGX | RGACX | FICGX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.94 | 124% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.94 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.773 | 15.516 | 89% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 577M | 332B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.62 | 17.83 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.50 | 58.53 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.89 | 40.02 | -2% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.35 | 95.93 | 16% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement