Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FICGX vs RGACX
FICGX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FICGX vs RGACX
Cantor Fitzgerald Large Cap Fcs Cl A
Price$14.11
Change+$0.07 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets595.89M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$84.36
Change+$0.32 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.66B
FICGX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FICGX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FICGX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. FICGX (596M). RGACX pays higher dividends than FICGX: RGACX (0.07) vs FICGX (0.00). FICGX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FICGX (25 years) vs RGACX (23 years). FICGX (1.17) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). FICGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than FICGX: RGACX (250) vs FICGX (1000). FICGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.57 vs. RGACX (12.22). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 45.63 vs. FICGX (5.27).
| FICGX | RGACX | FICGX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.94 | 124% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.94 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.780 | 17.183 | 103% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 596M | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.57 | 12.22 | 152% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.09 | 71.26 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.27 | 45.63 | 12% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.44 | 111.15 | 22% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement