Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FICEX vs RGACX
FICEX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FICEX vs RGACX
Frost Growth Equity Inst
Price$17.39
Change+$0.05 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets245.13M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.62
Change+$0.46 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
FICEX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FICEX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FICEX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. FICEX (245M). RGACX pays higher dividends than FICEX: RGACX (0.07) vs FICEX (0.00). FICEX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FICEX (17 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FICEX (0.67). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FICEX (17.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than FICEX: RGACX (250) vs FICEX (1000000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.83 vs. FICEX (0.87). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 40.02 vs. FICEX (2.40).
| FICEX | RGACX | FICEX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.94 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.94 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.541 | 15.516 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 245M | 332B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.87 | 17.83 | 5% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.59 | 58.53 | 37% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.40 | 40.02 | 6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.89 | 95.93 | 21% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers