Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FICDX vs TRAMX
FICDX vs TRAMX Comparison
Open Charts FICDX vs TRAMX
T. Rowe Price Africa & Middle East
Price$11.73
Change-$0.01 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets101.64M
FICDX vs TRAMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FICDX vs. TRAMX commentary
Sep 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FICDX is a Buy and TRAMX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FICDX has more cash in the bank: 1.02B vs. TRAMX (102M). TRAMX pays higher dividends than FICDX: TRAMX (4.73) vs FICDX (1.11). FICDX was incepted earlier than TRAMX: FICDX (38 years) vs TRAMX (18 years). TRAMX (1.77) is less costly to investors than FICDX (1.03). TRAMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.10 vs. FICDX (8.00). FICDX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRAMX: FICDX (0) vs TRAMX (2500). FICDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.90 vs. TRAMX (10.71). TRAMX return over 5 years is better than : 78.72 vs. FICDX (66.59).
| FICDX | TRAMX | FICDX / TRAMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.30 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.77 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.458 | 14.551 | 134% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.02B | 102M | 1,002% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.11 | 4.73 | 23% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.90 | 10.71 | 139% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.66 | 23.03 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.59 | 78.72 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.33 | 71.10 | 120% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement