Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FICDX vs FNORX
FICDX vs FNORX Comparison
Open Charts FICDX vs FNORX
FICDX vs FNORX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FICDX vs. FNORX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FICDX is a Hold and FNORX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FICDX has more cash in the bank: 1.03B vs. FNORX (327M). FNORX pays higher dividends than FICDX: FNORX (3.46) vs FICDX (1.10). FICDX was incepted earlier than FNORX: FICDX (38 years) vs FNORX (30 years). FICDX (1.03) is less costly to investors than FNORX (0.87). FNORX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 21.00 vs. FICDX (8.00). FICDX (0) and FNORX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FICDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.68 vs. FNORX (3.85). FICDX return over 5 years is better than : 65.13 vs. FNORX (22.88).
| FICDX | FNORX | FICDX / FNORX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.87 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.87 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.027 | 19.330 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.03B | 327M | 314% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 3.46 | 32% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.68 | 3.85 | 199% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.88 | 56.65 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.13 | 22.88 | 285% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.67 | 65.54 | 115% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement