FHRT
Price
$25.00
Change
-$0.04 (-0.16%)
Updated
Jun 16 closing price
Capitalization
8.1M
HBUV
Price
$1.30
Change
+$0.02 (+1.56%)
Updated
Oct 30 closing price
Capitalization
25.97M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FHRT vs HBUV

Header iconFHRT vs HBUV Comparison
Open Charts FHRT vs HBUVBanner chart's image
First Hartford
Price$25.00
Change-$0.04 (-0.16%)
Volume$100
Capitalization8.1M
Hubilu Venture
Price$1.30
Change+$0.02 (+1.56%)
Volume$309
Capitalization25.97M
FHRT vs HBUV Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FHRT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HBUV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FHRT vs. HBUV commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHRT is a Hold and HBUV is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (FHRT: $25.00 vs. HBUV: $1.30)
Brand notoriety: FHRT and HBUV are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FHRT: 10% vs. HBUV: 100%
Market capitalization -- FHRT: $8.1M vs. HBUV: $25.97M
FHRT [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $8.1M. HBUV’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $25.97M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FHRT’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileHBUV’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FHRT’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • HBUV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FHRT is a better buy in the long-term than HBUV.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FHRT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HBUV’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FHRT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • HBUV’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FHRT is a better buy in the short-term than HBUV.

Price Growth

FHRT (@Real Estate Development) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while HBUV (@Real Estate Development) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +2.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.21%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+2.35% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBUV($26M) has a higher market cap than FHRT($8.11M). HBUV has higher P/E ratio than FHRT: HBUV (131.58) vs FHRT (1.44). FHRT YTD gains are higher at: 163.158 vs. HBUV (0.000). FHRT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 25.3M vs. HBUV (1.09M). FHRT has more cash in the bank: 9.46M vs. HBUV (88.5K). HBUV has less debt than FHRT: HBUV (16.5M) vs FHRT (223M). FHRT has higher revenues than HBUV: FHRT (79.8M) vs HBUV (1.6M).
FHRTHBUVFHRT / HBUV
Capitalization8.11M26M31%
EBITDA25.3M1.09M2,332%
Gain YTD163.1580.000-
P/E Ratio1.44131.581%
Revenue79.8M1.6M4,991%
Total Cash9.46M88.5K10,689%
Total Debt223M16.5M1,352%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FHRT vs HBUV: Fundamental Ratings
FHRT
HBUV
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
559
SMR RATING
1..100
7100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3534
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1657
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FHRT's Valuation (69) in the null industry is in the same range as HBUV (77). This means that FHRT’s stock grew similarly to HBUV’s over the last 12 months.

FHRT's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HBUV (59). This means that FHRT’s stock grew somewhat faster than HBUV’s over the last 12 months.

FHRT's SMR Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HBUV (100). This means that FHRT’s stock grew significantly faster than HBUV’s over the last 12 months.

HBUV's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as FHRT (35). This means that HBUV’s stock grew similarly to FHRT’s over the last 12 months.

FHRT's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HBUV (57). This means that FHRT’s stock grew somewhat faster than HBUV’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FHRTHBUV
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
33%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
40%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
53%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
42%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
16%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
13%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
33%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
33%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FHRT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HBUV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MEXGF0.040.01
+22.79%
MEXICAN GOLD MNG CORP.
HUSIF0.37N/A
+1.29%
Nicola Mining Inc.
ICAGY9.380.04
+0.43%
International Consolidated Airlines Group SA
EBCOF15.53N/A
N/A
Ebara Corp.
EIHDF0.81N/A
N/A
888 Holdings plc.

FHRT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FHRT has been loosely correlated with HBUV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FHRT jumps, then HBUV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FHRT
1D Price
Change %
FHRT100%
N/A
HBUV - FHRT
60%
Loosely correlated
N/A
AGPYF - FHRT
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GZTGF - FHRT
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GEAHF - FHRT
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GMGSF - FHRT
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

HBUV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HBUV has been loosely correlated with FHRT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HBUV jumps, then FHRT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HBUV
1D Price
Change %
HBUV100%
N/A
FHRT - HBUV
60%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GYRO - HBUV
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UOKA - HBUV
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SWPFF - HBUV
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AZLCZ - HBUV
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More