FHNGY
Price
$7.11
Change
-$0.16 (-2.20%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
2.31B
LNBY
Price
$0.33
Change
-$0.12 (-26.67%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
15.6M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FHNGY vs LNBY

Header iconFHNGY vs LNBY Comparison
Open Charts FHNGY vs LNBYBanner chart's image
Foschini Group Ltd. (The)
Price$7.11
Change-$0.16 (-2.20%)
Volume$471
Capitalization2.31B
Landbay
Price$0.33
Change-$0.12 (-26.67%)
Volume$988
Capitalization15.6M
FHNGY vs LNBY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FHNGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LNBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FHNGY vs. LNBY commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHNGY is a Hold and LNBY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (FHNGY: $7.10 vs. LNBY: $0.33)
Brand notoriety: FHNGY and LNBY are both not notable
FHNGY represents the Department Stores, while LNBY is part of the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FHNGY: 97% vs. LNBY: 49%
Market capitalization -- FHNGY: $2.31B vs. LNBY: $15.6M
FHNGY [@Department Stores] is valued at $2.31B. LNBY’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $15.6M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Department Stores] industry ranges from $12.34T to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Department Stores] industry is $5.19B. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $8.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FHNGY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLNBY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FHNGY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LNBY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FHNGY is a better buy in the long-term than LNBY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FHNGY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LNBY’s TA Score has 0 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FHNGY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LNBY’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FHNGY is a better buy in the short-term than LNBY.

Price Growth

FHNGY (@Department Stores) experienced а +2.75% price change this week, while LNBY (@Specialty Stores) price change was -27.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Department Stores industry was +0.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.93%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +3.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.62%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Department Stores (+0.95% weekly)

A department store sells a wide variety of consumer goods under different “departments,” including (but not necessarily limited to) apparel, household appliances, home furnishings, personal care products, cosmetics, consumer electronics. During healthy macroeconomic conditions, consumers typically won’t shy away from big-ticket purchases; but during a downturn, consumer spending might get limited to the most necessary/daily essentials. Several department stores purchase items on bulk from manufacturers for resale to consumers at a profit. Some of the largest department stores companies in the U.S. include Kohl’s Corporation, Macy’s Inc., and Ollie’s Bargain Outlet Holdings Inc.

@Specialty Stores (+3.16% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHNGY($2.31B) has a higher market cap than LNBY($15.6M). FHNGY YTD gains are higher at: -18.853 vs. LNBY (-45.500). FHNGY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 12.2B vs. LNBY (-35.91K). FHNGY has more cash in the bank: 3.23B vs. LNBY (2.06K). LNBY has less debt than FHNGY: LNBY (88.3K) vs FHNGY (23.4B). FHNGY has higher revenues than LNBY: FHNGY (58.3B) vs LNBY (22.1K).
FHNGYLNBYFHNGY / LNBY
Capitalization2.31B15.6M14,808%
EBITDA12.2B-35.91K-33,970,040%
Gain YTD-18.853-45.50041%
P/E Ratio12.94N/A-
Revenue58.3B22.1K263,800,905%
Total Cash3.23B2.06K156,547,042%
Total Debt23.4B88.3K26,500,566%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FHNGYLNBY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FHNGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LNBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FGTAX28.110.21
+0.75%
Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock A
BTIRX165.860.87
+0.53%
DWS Equity 500 Index R6
WSCYX19.960.06
+0.30%
Macquarie Small Cap Growth Y
FBCIX76.050.22
+0.29%
American Funds Capital Income Bldr 529F2
HIAHX15.51N/A
N/A
Hartford Healthcare HLS IA

FHNGY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FHNGY and VBREY have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FHNGY and VBREY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FHNGY
1D Price
Change %
FHNGY100%
N/A
VBREY - FHNGY
7%
Poorly correlated
+1.10%
JZXN - FHNGY
5%
Poorly correlated
-2.40%
BARK - FHNGY
5%
Poorly correlated
-5.04%
LNBY - FHNGY
5%
Poorly correlated
-27.33%
JUMSF - FHNGY
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

LNBY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LNBY and FHNGY have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LNBY and FHNGY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LNBY
1D Price
Change %
LNBY100%
-27.33%
FHNGY - LNBY
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NVVE - LNBY
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OLPX - LNBY
4%
Poorly correlated
-2.60%
JZXN - LNBY
2%
Poorly correlated
-2.40%
BARK - LNBY
1%
Poorly correlated
-5.04%
More