Advertisement
FHNGY vs JZXN
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHNGY is a Hold and JZXN is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FHNGY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileJZXN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- FHNGY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- JZXN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FHNGY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JZXN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FHNGY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- JZXN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
FHNGY (@Department Stores) experienced а -5.50% price change this week, while JZXN (@Automotive Aftermarket) price change was -10.87% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Department Stores industry was +15.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.03%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was +1.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.24%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Department Stores (+15.75% weekly)A department store sells a wide variety of consumer goods under different “departments,” including (but not necessarily limited to) apparel, household appliances, home furnishings, personal care products, cosmetics, consumer electronics. During healthy macroeconomic conditions, consumers typically won’t shy away from big-ticket purchases; but during a downturn, consumer spending might get limited to the most necessary/daily essentials. Several department stores purchase items on bulk from manufacturers for resale to consumers at a profit. Some of the largest department stores companies in the U.S. include Kohl’s Corporation, Macy’s Inc., and Ollie’s Bargain Outlet Holdings Inc.
@Automotive Aftermarket (+1.44% weekly)The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).
| FHNGY | JZXN | FHNGY / JZXN | |
| Capitalization | 2.04B | 50.5M | 4,032% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -27.983 | -34.113 | 82% |
| P/E Ratio | 11.33 | 0.43 | 2,664% |
| Revenue | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 391K | - |
| FHNGY | JZXN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 6 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 26 days ago 67% | 20 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 26 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 69% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 87% |
Advertisement
FHNGY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FHNGY and VBREY have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FHNGY and VBREY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FHNGY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FHNGY | 100% | -0.80% | ||
| VBREY - FHNGY | 7% Poorly correlated | -1.11% | ||
| JZXN - FHNGY | 5% Poorly correlated | -2.34% | ||
| BARK - FHNGY | 5% Poorly correlated | -1.37% | ||
| LNBY - FHNGY | 5% Poorly correlated | -4.76% | ||
| JUMSF - FHNGY | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
JZXN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that JZXN and DNLMY have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JZXN and DNLMY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To JZXN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JZXN | 100% | -2.34% | ||
| DNLMY - JZXN | 29% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| WINA - JZXN | 21% Poorly correlated | -1.71% | ||
| ULTA - JZXN | 21% Poorly correlated | -1.57% | ||
| FLWS - JZXN | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.89% | ||
| BBWI - JZXN | 20% Poorly correlated | -2.66% | ||
More | ||||