FHNGY
Price
$7.02
Change
+$0.02 (+0.29%)
Updated
Jul 21 closing price
Capitalization
2.42B
JZXN
Price
$0.99
Change
+$0.01 (+1.02%)
Updated
Jul 21 closing price
Capitalization
473.16M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FHNGY vs JZXN

Header iconFHNGY vs JZXN Comparison
Open Charts FHNGY vs JZXNBanner chart's image
Foschini Group Ltd. (The)
Price$7.02
Change+$0.02 (+0.29%)
Volume$409
Capitalization2.42B
Jiuzi Holdings
Price$0.99
Change+$0.01 (+1.02%)
Volume$70.85K
Capitalization473.16M
FHNGY vs JZXN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FHNGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JZXN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FHNGY vs. JZXN commentary
Jul 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHNGY is a Hold and JZXN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 22, 2025
Stock price -- (FHNGY: $7.02 vs. JZXN: $0.99)
Brand notoriety: FHNGY and JZXN are both not notable
FHNGY represents the Department Stores, while JZXN is part of the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FHNGY: 54% vs. JZXN: 27%
Market capitalization -- FHNGY: $2.42B vs. JZXN: $473.16M
FHNGY [@Department Stores] is valued at $2.42B. JZXN’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $473.16M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Department Stores] industry ranges from $12.34T to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Department Stores] industry is $5.24B. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $8.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FHNGY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileJZXN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FHNGY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • JZXN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FHNGY is a better buy in the long-term than JZXN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FHNGY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JZXN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FHNGY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • JZXN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, JZXN is a better buy in the short-term than FHNGY.

Price Growth

FHNGY (@Department Stores) experienced а +0.65% price change this week, while JZXN (@Specialty Stores) price change was -7.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Department Stores industry was -0.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.59%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -1.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.24%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Department Stores (-0.56% weekly)

A department store sells a wide variety of consumer goods under different “departments,” including (but not necessarily limited to) apparel, household appliances, home furnishings, personal care products, cosmetics, consumer electronics. During healthy macroeconomic conditions, consumers typically won’t shy away from big-ticket purchases; but during a downturn, consumer spending might get limited to the most necessary/daily essentials. Several department stores purchase items on bulk from manufacturers for resale to consumers at a profit. Some of the largest department stores companies in the U.S. include Kohl’s Corporation, Macy’s Inc., and Ollie’s Bargain Outlet Holdings Inc.

@Specialty Stores (-1.65% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHNGY($2.42B) has a higher market cap than JZXN($473M). FHNGY has higher P/E ratio than JZXN: FHNGY (12.84) vs JZXN (4.25). FHNGY YTD gains are higher at: -18.329 vs. JZXN (-28.623).
FHNGYJZXNFHNGY / JZXN
Capitalization2.42B473M511%
EBITDAN/A-15.29M-
Gain YTD-18.329-28.62364%
P/E Ratio12.844.25302%
RevenueN/A6.22M-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A3.6M-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FHNGYJZXN
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FHNGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JZXN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RPFRX41.100.11
+0.27%
Davis Real Estate A
WBIRX30.930.05
+0.16%
William Blair International Growth R6
MSVEX5.35N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Vitality Portfolio A
MIQPX11.74N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst International Eq R6
HQICX20.94-0.09
-0.43%
Hartford Equity Income C

FHNGY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FHNGY and VBREY have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FHNGY and VBREY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FHNGY
1D Price
Change %
FHNGY100%
+0.33%
VBREY - FHNGY
7%
Poorly correlated
+4.34%
JZXN - FHNGY
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.00%
BARK - FHNGY
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.99%
LNBY - FHNGY
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JUMSF - FHNGY
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

JZXN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that JZXN and DNLMY have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JZXN and DNLMY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JZXN
1D Price
Change %
JZXN100%
+1.00%
DNLMY - JZXN
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WINA - JZXN
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.64%
ULTA - JZXN
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.83%
FLWS - JZXN
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.19%
BBWI - JZXN
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.83%
More