Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHNEX vs FNSFX
FHNEX vs FNSFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHNEX vs. FNSFX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHNEX is a Hold and FNSFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNSFX has more cash in the bank: 7.62B vs. FHNEX (1.31B). FNSFX (1.24) and FHNEX (1.22) have matching dividends . FHNEX was incepted earlier than FNSFX: FHNEX (7 years) vs FNSFX (8 years). FHNEX (0.72) is less costly to investors than FNSFX (0.65). FNSFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.00 vs. FHNEX (17.00). FHNEX (0) and FNSFX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FHNEX (14.52) and FNSFX (14.41) have marching annual gain over last year. FHNEX return over 5 years is better than : 49.55 vs. FNSFX (44.84).
| FHNEX | FNSFX | FHNEX / FNSFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.65 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.65 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.448 | 17.736 | 104% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.31B | 7.62B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.22 | 1.24 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.52 | 14.41 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.36 | 69.93 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.55 | 44.84 | 111% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |