FHN
Price
$22.85
Change
+$0.19 (+0.84%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
11.6B
17 days until earnings call
PBCRF
Price
$0.45
Change
-$0.06 (-11.76%)
Updated
Sep 9 closing price
Capitalization
56.02B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FHN vs PBCRF

Header iconFHN vs PBCRF Comparison
Open Charts FHN vs PBCRFBanner chart's image
First Horizon
Price$22.85
Change+$0.19 (+0.84%)
Volume$7.4M
Capitalization11.6B
PT Bank Central Asia
Price$0.45
Change-$0.06 (-11.76%)
Volume$36.56K
Capitalization56.02B
FHN vs PBCRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FHN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PBCRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FHN vs. PBCRF commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHN is a StrongBuy and PBCRF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (FHN: $22.85 vs. PBCRF: $0.45)
Brand notoriety: FHN and PBCRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FHN: 69% vs. PBCRF: 232%
Market capitalization -- FHN: $11.6B vs. PBCRF: $56.02B
FHN [@Regional Banks] is valued at $11.6B. PBCRF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $56.02B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $163.52B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FHN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePBCRF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FHN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PBCRF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FHN is a better buy in the long-term than PBCRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FHN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PBCRF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FHN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PBCRF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PBCRF is a better buy in the short-term than FHN.

Price Growth

FHN (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.08% price change this week, while PBCRF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

FHN is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.08% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PBCRF($56B) has a higher market cap than FHN($11.6B). PBCRF has higher P/E ratio than FHN: PBCRF (16.17) vs FHN (14.74). FHN YTD gains are higher at: 16.023 vs. PBCRF (-21.544). FHN has less debt than PBCRF: FHN (1.6B) vs PBCRF (1.79T).
FHNPBCRFFHN / PBCRF
Capitalization11.6B56B21%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD16.023-21.544-74%
P/E Ratio14.7416.1791%
RevenueN/A114.62T-
Total Cash988MN/A-
Total Debt1.6B1.79T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FHN vs PBCRF: Fundamental Ratings
FHN
PBCRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8650
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
421
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4686
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3188
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FHN's Valuation (55) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PBCRF (86) in the null industry. This means that FHN’s stock grew similarly to PBCRF’s over the last 12 months.

PBCRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FHN (42) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PBCRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FHN’s over the last 12 months.

PBCRF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as FHN (9) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PBCRF’s stock grew similarly to FHN’s over the last 12 months.

FHN's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PBCRF (86) in the null industry. This means that FHN’s stock grew somewhat faster than PBCRF’s over the last 12 months.

FHN's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PBCRF (88) in the null industry. This means that FHN’s stock grew somewhat faster than PBCRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FHNPBCRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
62%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
55%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FHN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PBCRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LENZ42.032.00
+5.00%
LENZ Therapeutics
WILC19.140.32
+1.70%
G Willi-Food International Ltd
GROW2.690.04
+1.51%
US Global Investors
PH750.725.64
+0.76%
Parker-Hannifin Corp
HOMB28.770.20
+0.70%
Home BancShares

FHN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FHN has been closely correlated with CADE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FHN jumps, then CADE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FHN
1D Price
Change %
FHN100%
+0.84%
CADE - FHN
87%
Closely correlated
+1.16%
ZION - FHN
83%
Closely correlated
+0.42%
FNB - FHN
83%
Closely correlated
+0.93%
KEY - FHN
83%
Closely correlated
+0.43%
CFG - FHN
83%
Closely correlated
+0.93%
More

PBCRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PBCRF and PPERY have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PBCRF and PPERY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PBCRF
1D Price
Change %
PBCRF100%
N/A
PPERY - PBCRF
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.46%
UOVEY - PBCRF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.58%
BLFY - PBCRF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.53%
FHN - PBCRF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.84%
PBCRY - PBCRF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
More