Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHLSX vs ONCFX
FHLSX vs ONCFX Comparison
Open Charts FHLSX vs ONCFX
Fidelity Health Savings
Price$11.25
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets67.71M
JPMorgan Investor Conservative Growth I
Price$13.29
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.39B
FHLSX vs ONCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHLSX vs. ONCFX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHLSX is a Hold and ONCFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ONCFX has more cash in the bank: 4.39B vs. FHLSX (67.7M). ONCFX pays higher dividends than FHLSX: ONCFX (3.44) vs FHLSX (2.95). FHLSX was incepted earlier than ONCFX: FHLSX (6 years) vs ONCFX (29 years). ONCFX (0.69) is less costly to investors than FHLSX (0.50). FHLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. ONCFX (11.00). FHLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than ONCFX: FHLSX (0) vs ONCFX (1000000). FHLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.84 vs. ONCFX (10.92). FHLSX return over 5 years is better than : 17.89 vs. ONCFX (12.75).
| FHLSX | ONCFX | FHLSX / ONCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.69 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.69 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.353 | 0.988 | 137% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 1000000 | - |
| Net Assets | 67.7M | 4.39B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.95 | 3.44 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.84 | 10.92 | 127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.46 | 23.63 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.89 | 12.75 | 140% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 44.19 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement