Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHLKX vs ONCFX
FHLKX vs ONCFX Comparison
Open Charts FHLKX vs ONCFX
Fidelity Health Savings K
Price$11.24
Change+$0.02 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets67.46M
JPMorgan Investor Conservative Growth I
Price$13.31
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.35B
FHLKX vs ONCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHLKX vs. ONCFX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHLKX is a StrongBuy and ONCFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ONCFX has more cash in the bank: 4.35B vs. FHLKX (67.5M). ONCFX pays higher dividends than FHLKX: ONCFX (3.41) vs FHLKX (2.84). FHLKX was incepted earlier than ONCFX: FHLKX (6 years) vs ONCFX (29 years). ONCFX (0.69) is less costly to investors than FHLKX (0.40). FHLKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. ONCFX (11.00). FHLKX has a lower initial minimum investment than ONCFX: FHLKX (0) vs ONCFX (1000000). FHLKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.42 vs. ONCFX (8.98). FHLKX return over 5 years is better than : 17.73 vs. ONCFX (13.29).
| FHLKX | ONCFX | FHLKX / ONCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.69 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.69 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.110 | 9.554 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 1000000 | - |
| Net Assets | 67.5M | 4.35B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.84 | 3.41 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.42 | 8.98 | 127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.97 | 26.80 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.73 | 13.29 | 133% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 38.32 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement