Advertisement
FHLD vs NPTVF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHLD is a Hold and NPTVF is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FHLD’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNPTVF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- FHLD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- NPTVF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FHLD’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- FHLD’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
FHLD (@Broadcasting) experienced а -12.28% price change this week, while NPTVF (@Broadcasting) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Broadcasting industry was -1.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.98%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Broadcasting (-1.03% weekly)Broadcasting industry includes companies that operate facilities broadcasting radio and/or television programs. Sirius XM Holdings, Inc. (which provides satellite radio and online radio services); Fox Corporation (news and sports broadcasting on TV); and CBS Corporation (TV broadcasting) are some of the behemoths of this industry. The burgeoning digital space has been a disruption for the industry, propelling them to up the ante on their own digital presence.
| FHLD | NPTVF | FHLD / NPTVF | |
| Capitalization | 1.79M | 6.31B | 0% |
| EBITDA | 7.31M | 73B | 0% |
| Gain YTD | -75.610 | 55.021 | -137% |
| P/E Ratio | 0.58 | 17.37 | 3% |
| Revenue | 16.1M | 444B | 0% |
| Total Cash | 1.38M | 174B | 0% |
| Total Debt | 142K | 11.1B | 0% |
FHLD | NPTVF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 42 Fair valued | 32 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 53 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 24 | 11 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 45 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 45 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NPTVF's Valuation (32) in the null industry is in the same range as FHLD (42). This means that NPTVF’s stock grew similarly to FHLD’s over the last 12 months.
NPTVF's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FHLD (100). This means that NPTVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FHLD’s over the last 12 months.
NPTVF's SMR Rating (11) in the null industry is in the same range as FHLD (24). This means that NPTVF’s stock grew similarly to FHLD’s over the last 12 months.
NPTVF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FHLD (98). This means that NPTVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FHLD’s over the last 12 months.
NPTVF's P/E Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FHLD (100). This means that NPTVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FHLD’s over the last 12 months.
| FHLD | NPTVF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 10% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 10% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 68% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | N/A |
Advertisement
FHLD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FHLD and FUBO have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FHLD and FUBO's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FHLD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FHLD | 100% | +7.14% | ||
| FUBO - FHLD | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.54% | ||
| GTN - FHLD | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.24% | ||
| TGNA - FHLD | 20% Poorly correlated | +1.80% | ||
| IHRTB - FHLD | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TVBCY - FHLD | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
NPTVF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NPTVF has been loosely correlated with MDIA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NPTVF jumps, then MDIA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NPTVF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NPTVF | 100% | N/A | ||
| MDIA - NPTVF | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.74% | ||
| FHLD - NPTVF | 0% Poorly correlated | +7.14% | ||
| MTPVY - NPTVF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| IHRTB - NPTVF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TVBCY - NPTVF | -6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||