Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHLC vs IBB
FHLC vs IBB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHLC vs. IBB commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHLC is a StrongBuy and IBB is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IBB has more net assets: 5.7B vs. FHLC (2.46B). IBB has a higher annual dividend yield than FHLC: IBB (3.920) vs FHLC (-1.213). FHLC was incepted earlier than IBB: FHLC (12 years) vs IBB (25 years). FHLC (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than IBB (0.45). IBB has a higher turnover FHLC (5.00) vs FHLC (5.00).
| FHLC | IBB | FHLC / IBB | |
| Gain YTD | -1.213 | 3.920 | -31% |
| Net Assets | 2.46B | 5.7B | 43% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 0.45 | 19% |
| Turnover | 5.00 | 18.00 | 28% |
| Yield | 1.64 | 0.29 | 566% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 25 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FHLC | IBB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 83% | 10 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FHLC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FHLC has been closely correlated with TMO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FHLC jumps, then TMO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FHLC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FHLC | 100% | +0.45% | ||
| TMO - FHLC | 70% Closely correlated | +0.05% | ||
| A - FHLC | 69% Closely correlated | -1.18% | ||
| TECH - FHLC | 67% Closely correlated | -1.77% | ||
| MTD - FHLC | 67% Closely correlated | -0.79% | ||
| DHR - FHLC | 66% Closely correlated | +0.52% | ||
More | ||||
IBB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IBB has been closely correlated with TECH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IBB jumps, then TECH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IBB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBB | 100% | +0.12% | ||
| TECH - IBB | 72% Closely correlated | -1.77% | ||
| MTD - IBB | 70% Closely correlated | -0.79% | ||
| IDYA - IBB | 69% Closely correlated | -0.20% | ||
| BIIB - IBB | 68% Closely correlated | -0.18% | ||
| ROIV - IBB | 66% Closely correlated | -1.76% | ||
More | ||||