Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKTX vs WICGX
FHKTX vs WICGX Comparison
Open Charts FHKTX vs WICGX
Fidelity Advisor China Region M
Price$53.35
Change-$0.30 (-0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.6B
William Blair China Growth I
Price$6.51
Change-$0.17 (-2.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.17M
FHKTX vs WICGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKTX has more cash in the bank: 1.6B vs. WICGX (2.17M). WICGX pays higher dividends than FHKTX: WICGX (1.05) vs FHKTX (0.78). FHKTX was incepted earlier than WICGX: FHKTX (17 years) vs WICGX (4 years). WICGX (9.46) is less costly to investors than FHKTX (1.43). WICGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. FHKTX (30.00). FHKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than WICGX: FHKTX (0) vs WICGX (500000). FHKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.71 vs. WICGX (26.23).
| FHKTX | WICGX | FHKTX / WICGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 0.99 | 144% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 9.46 | 15% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 40.210 | 22.830 | 176% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.6B | 2.17M | 73,730% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.78 | 1.05 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.71 | 26.23 | 129% |
| Returns for 3 years | 99.90 | 14.32 | 698% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.33 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.74 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement