Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKTX vs RCEAX
FHKTX vs RCEAX Comparison
Open Charts FHKTX vs RCEAX
Fidelity Advisor China Region M
Price$53.88
Change-$0.55 (-1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.81B
RBC China Equity A
Price$13.12
Change+$0.03 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.83M
FHKTX vs RCEAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKTX has more cash in the bank: 1.81B vs. RCEAX (6.83M). RCEAX pays higher dividends than FHKTX: RCEAX (1.16) vs FHKTX (0.77). FHKTX was incepted earlier than RCEAX: FHKTX (18 years) vs RCEAX (4 years). RCEAX (7.70) is less costly to investors than FHKTX (1.43). RCEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 132.00 vs. FHKTX (30.00). RCEAX initial investment is less costly to investors than FHKTX (4%) vs FHKTX (4%). FHKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RCEAX: FHKTX (0) vs RCEAX (1000). RCEAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 47.48 vs. FHKTX (41.47).
| FHKTX | RCEAX | FHKTX / RCEAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.30 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 7.70 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 43.049 | 53.819 | 80% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 61% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.81B | 6.83M | 26,533% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.77 | 1.16 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | 41.47 | 47.48 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 89.88 | 62.17 | 145% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.75 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.83 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement