Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKTX vs RBCRX
FHKTX vs RBCRX Comparison
Open Charts FHKTX vs RBCRX
Fidelity Advisor China Region M
Price$46.90
Change-$0.31 (-0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.3B
RBC China Equity R6
Price$10.99
Change-$0.07 (-0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.76M
FHKTX vs RBCRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKTX vs. RBCRX commentary
Aug 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKTX is a Buy and RBCRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKTX has more cash in the bank: 1.31B vs. RBCRX (5.76M). RBCRX pays higher dividends than FHKTX: RBCRX (1.68) vs FHKTX (0.93). FHKTX was incepted earlier than RBCRX: FHKTX (17 years) vs RBCRX (3 years). RBCRX (6.88) is less costly to investors than FHKTX (1.43). RBCRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 132.00 vs. FHKTX (30.00). FHKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBCRX: FHKTX (0) vs RBCRX (250000). RBCRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 37.76 vs. FHKTX (29.53).
| FHKTX | RBCRX | FHKTX / RBCRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.00 | 143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 6.88 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 3 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.074 | 29.294 | 82% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.31B | 5.76M | 22,648% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.93 | 1.68 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.53 | 37.76 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.92 | 22.65 | 220% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.54 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.64 | 14.28 | 558% |