Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKTX vs NGCAX
FHKTX vs NGCAX Comparison
Open Charts FHKTX vs NGCAX
Fidelity Advisor China Region M
Price$53.35
Change-$0.30 (-0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.6B
Columbia Greater China A
Price$43.73
Change-$0.09 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets52.49M
FHKTX vs NGCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKTX vs. NGCAX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKTX is a Hold and NGCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKTX has more cash in the bank: 1.6B vs. NGCAX (52.5M). NGCAX (0.79) and FHKTX (0.78) have matching dividends . FHKTX was incepted earlier than NGCAX: FHKTX (17 years) vs NGCAX (28 years). NGCAX (1.64) is less costly to investors than FHKTX (1.43). NGCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FHKTX (30.00). NGCAX initial investment is less costly to investors than FHKTX (4%) vs FHKTX (4%). FHKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than NGCAX: FHKTX (0) vs NGCAX (2000). FHKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.71 vs. NGCAX (30.68). FHKTX return over 5 years is better than : 7.33 vs. NGCAX (-37.11).
| FHKTX | NGCAX | FHKTX / NGCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.49 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.64 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 40.210 | 31.519 | 128% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 61% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.6B | 52.5M | 3,042% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.78 | 0.79 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.71 | 30.68 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 99.90 | 40.74 | 245% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.33 | -37.11 | -20% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.74 | 22.30 | 384% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement